Knowledge Resource
Research Summary: Teachers’ use of generative artificial intelligence in K–12 education: a systematic review
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 2 October 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Knowledge Resource
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
A systematic review of research on K-12 teachers' use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) highlights its increasing integration into instructional processes. GenAI offers opportunities for teachers in areas such as lesson planning, assessment, feedback generation, content creation, and classroom support. However, the existing literature on this topic is fragmented across various contexts, methodologies, and theoretical perspectives.
Why it matters
The rapid advancement and adoption of generative AI in educational settings present a significant technological shift impacting human capital and operational efficiency. Understanding its current applications and the landscape of related research is crucial for strategic planning, resource allocation, and maintaining educational quality.
Key insights
- Generative AI (GenAI) is rapidly advancing and creating new opportunities and challenges for K-12 educators.
- GenAI is increasingly integrated into instructional processes, supporting teachers in multiple tasks.
- Specific applications of GenAI for teachers include lesson planning, assessment, feedback generation, content creation, and classroom support.
- Research on teachers' use of GenAI is distributed across diverse contexts, methodologies, and theoretical perspectives.
Source
Frontiers in Education — https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1935733
Related intelligence and resources
Previous
Measuring attitudes of ethical use of GenAI in the work of university educators in Slovakia
Next
The impact of artificial intelligence on the quality of legal education in the UAE: a critical analysis of legal, pedagogical, and ethical considerations
The Den frees up 10-15 hours a week to grow with ChatGPT Work
Knowledge Resource
Whose Voice Survives the Summary? A Voice-Retention Audit of LLM Employee Listening
Knowledge Resource
The Concentration of Artificial Intelligence in Big Tech and Its Implications for Human Rights in the European Union
Knowledge Resource
Student teachers' perceptions of conditions for reflection in digital supervision
Knowledge Resource
Bridging barriers through technology integration in mathematics education: a qualitative multiple-case study of rural schools
Knowledge Resource
Guidance: The Prevent duty: safeguarding learners susceptible to radicalisation
Knowledge Resource
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXE-2026-01055
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 2 October 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- Teachers’ use of generative artificial intelligence in K–12 education: a systematic review
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.