Knowledge Resource · Open access
Research Summary: Measuring attitudes of ethical use of GenAI in the work of university educators in Slovakia
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 2 October 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Knowledge Resource
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
A cross-sectional quantitative survey investigated university educators' attitudes towards 31 identified ethical problems related to the use of Generative AI (GenAI) in their academic work. The study aimed to empirically establish priorities for institutional AI governance, addressing a gap in existing literature regarding how educators differentiate and prioritize these ethical dilemmas. Data was collected from 388 educators across Slovak public and private universities.
Why it matters
Understanding the practical ethical concerns of educators regarding GenAI is critical for developing effective and accepted institutional policies. This research directly informs the strategic integration of AI by identifying areas requiring immediate governance attention and resource allocation, ensuring that technological advancement aligns with ethical principles and educator adoption.
Key insights
- Existing AI ethics frameworks offer broad principles but lack empirical evidence on educators' practical prioritization of ethical dilemmas.
- No prior study comprehensively examined all 31 ethical problems identified across seven domains of university educators' academic activity.
- The survey collected data from 388 educators in Slovakia, focusing on their attitudes towards specific GenAI ethical issues.
- The research aims to inform institutional AI governance by establishing relative priorities for these ethical problems.
Source
Frontiers in Education — https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1929871
Related resources
Previous
The competence enactment paradox: teacher innovation as the missing mechanism in the DIPTERA model of professional development
Next
Teachers’ use of generative artificial intelligence in K–12 education: a systematic review
The Den frees up 10-15 hours a week to grow with ChatGPT Work
Knowledge Resource
Whose Voice Survives the Summary? A Voice-Retention Audit of LLM Employee Listening
Knowledge Resource
The Concentration of Artificial Intelligence in Big Tech and Its Implications for Human Rights in the European Union
Knowledge Resource
Student teachers' perceptions of conditions for reflection in digital supervision
Knowledge Resource
Bridging barriers through technology integration in mathematics education: a qualitative multiple-case study of rural schools
Knowledge Resource
Guidance: The Prevent duty: safeguarding learners susceptible to radicalisation
Knowledge Resource
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXE-2026-01054
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 2 October 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- Measuring attitudes of ethical use of GenAI in the work of university educators in Slovakia
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.