Executive Guide
The Socratic Challenger: a structured GenAI-assisted workflow for undergraduate research inquiry
- Author
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Published
- August 18, 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
Executive Summary
A mixed-methods study assessed an eight-step Generative AI (GenAI)-assisted workflow designed for undergraduate research question development in an ecology course. This workflow integrated AI-supported exploration with iterative human processes including literature verification, revision, and feedback. The research aimed to clarify the role of GenAI in early-stage academic inquiry, utilizing both quantitative ratings of workflow steps and qualitative student reflections from 45 participants.
A mixed-methods study assessed an eight-step Generative AI (GenAI)-assisted workflow designed for undergraduate research question development in an ecology course. This workflow integrated AI-supported exploration with iterative human processes including literature verification, revision, and feedback. The research aimed to clarify the role of GenAI in early-stage academic inquiry, utilizing both quantitative ratings of workflow steps and qualitative student reflections from 45 participants.
Why it matters
The integration of Generative AI into research methodologies represents a significant technological shift that can enhance educational and operational efficiencies. Understanding how structured GenAI workflows support complex tasks like research inquiry is crucial for organizations looking to leverage AI responsibly and effectively. This research provides insights into potential frameworks for adopting AI in knowledge-intensive domains.
Key insights
- The study evaluated an eight-step GenAI-assisted workflow for developing research questions in an undergraduate ecology course.
- The workflow incorporated alternating stages of GenAI-supported exploration and human-led activities like literature verification, revision, and feedback.
- Data was collected from 45 consenting undergraduate students, using ordinal ratings for perceived contribution of workflow steps and written reflections.
- The research focused on understanding the utility of GenAI in the early phases of academic inquiry, specifically research question formulation.
Source
Frontiers in Education — https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1913451
Related publications
Previous
Future orientation as a moderator of the association between bullying and cyberbullying victimization and perceived academic performance during adolescence
Next
Educational stress, anxiety, and academic success among Palestinian university students
How leading a math circle fosters personal growth: a multiple case study of undergraduates conducting STEM outreach
Executive Guide
“Should I tell my teacher?” Student AI disclosure practices, stigma, and self-regulated learning in higher education
Executive Guide
Design guidelines for educational chatbots: supporting international students’ acculturation in higher education
Executive Guide
Sustainable leadership and future-ready school development in secondary schools in Irbid Governorate: the indirect explanatory role of organizational learning
Executive Guide
Association between sensor-based physical activity, sedentary behaviour, sleep, and mental health in university students: a systematic review
Executive Guide
Educational stress, anxiety, and academic success among Palestinian university students
Executive Guide
Download & citation
Cite this publication (APA 7)
Aziz Shuaib Ausi (2026). The Socratic Challenger: a structured GenAI-assisted workflow for undergraduate research inquiry. Executive Guide. Aziz Shuaib Ausi. https://www.azizshuaib.com/verify/ASA-EXG-2026-00360
Verification
This is an authenticated institutional record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00360
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 8/18/2026
- Publisher
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Licence
- All rights reserved. Reproduction requires written permission.