Executive Guide · Open access
Research Summary: Future orientation as a moderator of the association between bullying and cyberbullying victimization and perceived academic performance during adolescence
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 18 August 2026
- Last updated
- 21 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
A study involving 876 Italian upper secondary school students investigated the relationship between traditional and cyberbullying victimization and perceived academic performance. The research specifically explored whether 'future orientation' acts as a moderating factor in these associations, recognizing peer victimization as a relational process impacting adolescent development and learning engagement.
Why it matters
This research provides insights into the complex interplay between social dynamics, mental well-being, and academic outcomes within educational settings. Understanding the moderating role of future orientation can inform strategies aimed at supporting adolescent resilience and academic success amidst challenges like peer victimization.
Key insights
- Traditional and cyberbullying victimization are associated with perceived academic performance in adolescents.
- The study focused on Italian upper secondary school students aged 14–17 years.
- Future orientation was examined as a potential moderator of the relationship between victimization and academic performance.
- The methodology involved self-report measures for victimization (bullying and cyberbullying), perpetration, future orientation, and perceived academic performance.
Source
Frontiers in Education — https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1884365
Related resources
Previous
Transparency data: Higher education providers with T Levels in entry requirements
Next
The Socratic Challenger: a structured GenAI-assisted workflow for undergraduate research inquiry
Transformative play: integrating outdoor adventure education and the NPI-cycle to facilitate transformative experience
Executive Guide
Cybersecurity Threat Delays Start of Classes at UT San Antonio
Executive Guide
Towards the determination of competencies of the commercial engineer in Chile
Executive Guide
From Atari to EVE Online: Building on 15 Years of AI Research in Games
Executive Guide
Bankrupt Saint Augustine’s Will Not Offer Fall Classes
Executive Guide
Cornell Hopes to Turn Cheating Into Teachable Moment
Executive Guide
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00359
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 18 August 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- Future orientation as a moderator of the association between bullying and cyberbullying victimization and perceived academic performance during adolescence
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.