Executive Guide · Open access
Research Summary: “Should I tell my teacher?” Student AI disclosure practices, stigma, and self-regulated learning in higher education
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 18 August 2026
- Last updated
- 21 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
Research from Frontiers in Education indicates that the increasing use of generative AI (GAI) tools by students in higher education raises significant concerns regarding academic integrity and self-regulated learning. A study involving 78 undergraduate students explored factors influencing their willingness to disclose AI tool use, including worries about negative consequences, AI usage behaviors, and demographic factors. Preliminary findings suggest a correlation between these factors and disclosure practices.
Why it matters
The integration of AI in educational settings presents a strategic challenge to established norms of academic integrity and student development. Understanding student disclosure practices is crucial for maintaining credible assessment frameworks and fostering ethical technological adoption within educational institutions. This issue impacts the perceived value of qualifications and the future workforce's preparedness for AI-driven environments.
Key insights
- Generative AI tools are becoming popular in education, prompting questions about student disclosure of their use.
- Student AI disclosure practices are a critical concern for academic integrity and self-regulated learning (SRL).
- The study examines how worries about negative consequences, AI usage behaviors, and demographic factors relate to students' willingness to disclose AI use.
- Survey data from 78 undergraduate students in an online education course informed the research.
- Preliminary composite indicators for 'worry' and 'disclosure' were retained, suggesting these are key aspects.
Source
Frontiers in Education — https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1826174
Related resources
Previous
Design guidelines for educational chatbots: supporting international students’ acculturation in higher education
Next
How leading a math circle fosters personal growth: a multiple case study of undergraduates conducting STEM outreach
Transformative play: integrating outdoor adventure education and the NPI-cycle to facilitate transformative experience
Executive Guide
Cybersecurity Threat Delays Start of Classes at UT San Antonio
Executive Guide
Towards the determination of competencies of the commercial engineer in Chile
Executive Guide
From Atari to EVE Online: Building on 15 Years of AI Research in Games
Executive Guide
Bankrupt Saint Augustine’s Will Not Offer Fall Classes
Executive Guide
Cornell Hopes to Turn Cheating Into Teachable Moment
Executive Guide
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00365
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 18 August 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- “Should I tell my teacher?” Student AI disclosure practices, stigma, and self-regulated learning in higher education
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.