Executive Guide
“Should I tell my teacher?” Student AI disclosure practices, stigma, and self-regulated learning in higher education
- Author
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Published
- August 18, 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
Executive Summary
Research from Frontiers in Education indicates that the increasing use of generative AI (GAI) tools by students in higher education raises significant concerns regarding academic integrity and self-regulated learning. A study involving 78 undergraduate students explored factors influencing their willingness to disclose AI tool use, including worries about negative consequences, AI usage behaviors, and demographic factors. Preliminary findings suggest a correlation between these factors and disclosure practices.
Research from Frontiers in Education indicates that the increasing use of generative AI (GAI) tools by students in higher education raises significant concerns regarding academic integrity and self-regulated learning. A study involving 78 undergraduate students explored factors influencing their willingness to disclose AI tool use, including worries about negative consequences, AI usage behaviors, and demographic factors. Preliminary findings suggest a correlation between these factors and disclosure practices.
Why it matters
The integration of AI in educational settings presents a strategic challenge to established norms of academic integrity and student development. Understanding student disclosure practices is crucial for maintaining credible assessment frameworks and fostering ethical technological adoption within educational institutions. This issue impacts the perceived value of qualifications and the future workforce's preparedness for AI-driven environments.
Key insights
- Generative AI tools are becoming popular in education, prompting questions about student disclosure of their use.
- Student AI disclosure practices are a critical concern for academic integrity and self-regulated learning (SRL).
- The study examines how worries about negative consequences, AI usage behaviors, and demographic factors relate to students' willingness to disclose AI use.
- Survey data from 78 undergraduate students in an online education course informed the research.
- Preliminary composite indicators for 'worry' and 'disclosure' were retained, suggesting these are key aspects.
Source
Frontiers in Education — https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1826174
Related publications
Previous
Design guidelines for educational chatbots: supporting international students’ acculturation in higher education
Next
How leading a math circle fosters personal growth: a multiple case study of undergraduates conducting STEM outreach
How leading a math circle fosters personal growth: a multiple case study of undergraduates conducting STEM outreach
Executive Guide
Design guidelines for educational chatbots: supporting international students’ acculturation in higher education
Executive Guide
Sustainable leadership and future-ready school development in secondary schools in Irbid Governorate: the indirect explanatory role of organizational learning
Executive Guide
Association between sensor-based physical activity, sedentary behaviour, sleep, and mental health in university students: a systematic review
Executive Guide
Educational stress, anxiety, and academic success among Palestinian university students
Executive Guide
The Socratic Challenger: a structured GenAI-assisted workflow for undergraduate research inquiry
Executive Guide
Download & citation
Cite this publication (APA 7)
Aziz Shuaib Ausi (2026). “Should I tell my teacher?” Student AI disclosure practices, stigma, and self-regulated learning in higher education. Executive Guide. Aziz Shuaib Ausi. https://www.azizshuaib.com/verify/ASA-EXG-2026-00365
Verification
This is an authenticated institutional record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00365
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 8/18/2026
- Publisher
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Licence
- All rights reserved. Reproduction requires written permission.