Knowledge Resource · Open access
Research Summary: Measuring Time-Horizon Engagement Effectiveness: Persistence, Recency, and Re-Emergence
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 15 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Knowledge Resource
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
Research introduces the Time-Horizon Engagement Effectiveness (TH-EE) framework, a new method for analyzing online attention. This framework moves beyond traditional metrics like cumulative volume or peak activity to provide a more nuanced understanding of engagement patterns, specifically distinguishing between persistence, recency, and re-emergence of online attention.
Why it matters
Understanding how engagement evolves over time is crucial for strategic resource allocation, content lifecycle management, and measuring the true impact of digital initiatives. This framework provides a more sophisticated analytical tool to assess sustained relevance, timely impact, and the potential for content revival, informing long-term digital strategy.
Key insights
- Traditional online attention metrics (cumulative volume, peak activity, averages) may obscure critical differences in engagement patterns.
- The TH-EE framework offers interpretable temporal profiles by analyzing persistence (sustained over time), recency (concentrated near present), and re-emergence (renewed after dormancy).
- These three properties are distinct and non-equivalent, providing a richer understanding of how content engages audiences over time.
- The framework's efficacy was evaluated using controlled engagement traces and a proof-of-concept application involving 1,850 YouTube videos across 37 topics.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14474
Related resources
Previous
How User-AI Mistreatment Occurs and Matters in Conversational Systems?
Next
Exploring K-12 Teachers' Perceptions of Students' Relationships with AI Companions: Boundaries, Intervention Strategies, and Design Implications
Dataset repurposing and disruptive AI research
Knowledge Resource
Mapping U.S. Federal AI Governance Against Sector Vulnerability
Knowledge Resource
AI-Driven Feedback Systems, Digital Labour, and Silent Quitting: Transforming African Workplaces
Knowledge Resource
Beyond Cultural Knowledge: Evaluating Arabic Cultural Appropriateness of Large Language Models
Knowledge Resource
Measuring AI harms with multidimensional Lorenz Zonoids
Knowledge Resource
Using Codebooks to Detect Cybercrime Topics in Text Narratives
Knowledge Resource
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXE-2026-00559
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 15 September 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- Measuring Time-Horizon Engagement Effectiveness: Persistence, Recency, and Re-Emergence
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.