Skip to main content
1 min readKnowledge Resource

Knowledge Resource · Open access

Research Summary: From viewing to ideating: a two-cycle design-based development of an undergraduate art appreciation course and its associations with divergent thinking and creative self-efficacy

Original authors
Attribution requires verification
Original source
Frontiers in Education
Summary & Analysis prepared by
Aziz Shuaib Ausi
Resource type
Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
Resource published on AZIZ OS
31 October 2026
Reading time
1 min
Publication type
Knowledge Resource
Availability
Open access
About this Summary & Analysis

AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.

Checking access…

A study published in Frontiers in Education investigated curricular redesign in undergraduate art appreciation for non-specialist education majors, transitioning instructional focus from passive observation to active ideation. Utilising a two-cycle design-based research methodology across successive 16-week cohorts of 65 and 70 students, the investigation evaluated divergent thinking, creative self-efficacy, classroom discourse, and student artefacts to pinpoint where ideation breaks down. While the source documentation cuts off before detailing full comparative findings, it highlights systemic limitations in standard viewing-to-understanding models.

Why it matters

Cultivating divergent thinking and creative self-efficacy is vital for developing adaptive, problem-solving capabilities in future educators and professionals. Demonstrating where traditional instruction fails to foster generative ideation provides the empirical foundation needed to transition academic programmes from passive content consumption to active creative competency. This matters strategically as higher education faces growing pressure to deliver measurable, transferable cognitive skills.

Key insights

  • Conventional undergraduate art appreciation curricula consistently foster observation and interpretive skills but systematically fail to cultivate independent ideation.
  • The study executed a two-cycle design-based research intervention over two 16-week terms led by the same instructor to analyse breakdowns in moving from viewing to ideating.
  • Target participants were undergraduate education-related majors lacking specialist arts backgrounds, evaluated across two successive cohorts of 65 and 70 students.
  • Data collection measured divergent thinking and creative self-efficacy alongside classroom discourse, ideation artefacts, and reflective journals.
  • Cycle 1 retained a conventional viewing-centred structure to serve as a baseline for descriptive comparisons.

Source

Frontiers in Education — https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1964619

Citation

Cite the original work (APA 7)

The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.

Verification

This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.

Verification ID
ASA-EXE-2026-01511
Version
v1.0 · r0
Issued
31 October 2026
Resource prepared by
Aziz Shuaib Ausi
Resource status
Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
Underlying work
From viewing to ideating: a two-cycle design-based development of an undergraduate art appreciation course and its associations with divergent thinking and creative self-efficacy
Original authors
Attribution requires verification
Original source
Frontiers in Education
Provenance status
Attribution requires verification
Rights
Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.

This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.

Verify this resource