Knowledge Resource · Open access
Research Summary: How to build a campfire? Participatory modelling with justice
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 16 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Knowledge Resource
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
Energy transition decision-making faces significant challenges due to deep uncertainties. While computational models offer valuable insights into techno-economic complexities, they are insufficient on their own to address the inherent justice dilemmas also present within these uncertainties. A more holistic approach is needed to navigate these multifaceted challenges effectively.
Why it matters
Addressing energy transition decisions requires a comprehensive strategy that goes beyond purely technical or economic modeling. Neglecting the justice dimension can lead to inequitable outcomes, potentially undermining the long-term viability and social acceptance of energy transition initiatives.
Key insights
- Energy transition decisions are characterized by substantial uncertainties.
- Computational models are useful tools for understanding techno-economic complexity in energy transitions.
- Models alone cannot resolve uncertainties related to justice dilemmas.
- Justice-related uncertainties are an integral component of energy transition decision-making.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16087
Related resources
Previous
Finding Common Mistakes In Modelling With Mathematical Formalisms Using LLMs
Next
Disrupted Companionship: A Risk Assessment Framework and Cross-Platform Quantitative Analysis of Psychosocial Responses to AI Companion Disruptions
Disrupted Companionship: A Risk Assessment Framework and Cross-Platform Quantitative Analysis of Psychosocial Responses to AI Companion Disruptions
Knowledge Resource
Finding Common Mistakes In Modelling With Mathematical Formalisms Using LLMs
Knowledge Resource
Evaluating Ambient Clinical Scribes in India: The Need for Multilingual Real-World Clinical Conversation Data
Knowledge Resource
The Role of Implicit and Explicit Demographic Signals in Large Language Model-based Student Assessment
Knowledge Resource
Do Agents Repair When Challenged -- or Just Reply? Challenge, Repair, and Public Correction in a Deployed Agent Forum
Knowledge Resource
Memorisation bias in medical AI
Knowledge Resource
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXE-2026-00609
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 16 September 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- How to build a campfire? Participatory modelling with justice
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.