Skip to main content
1 min readKnowledge Resource

Knowledge Resource

Research Summary: Comparability of student evaluations of teaching across Arabic- and English-medium higher education tracks: measurement invariance evidence from the UAE

Original authors
Attribution requires verification
Original source
Frontiers in Education
Summary & Analysis prepared by
Aziz Shuaib Ausi
Resource type
Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
Resource published on AZIZ OS
8 September 2026
Last updated
21 September 2026
Reading time
1 min
Publication type
Knowledge Resource
Availability
Open access
About this Summary & Analysis

AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.

Checking access…

A study conducted in the United Arab Emirates investigated the measurement comparability of a 49-item Course Evaluation Survey (CES) across parallel Arabic-medium and English-medium higher education tracks. The research aimed to determine if student evaluations of teaching can be meaningfully interpreted and compared between these linguistically distinct groups, given that both tracks share equivalent learning outcomes, content, and objectives. The findings regarding measurement comparability are crucial for universities utilizing such evaluations across diverse language instructional settings.

Why it matters

This research addresses a critical methodological challenge in higher education, as the comparability of student evaluations across different language tracks directly impacts institutional decision-making regarding teaching effectiveness, resource allocation, and curriculum development. Ensuring the validity and reliability of such evaluative tools is essential for maintaining equitable standards and fostering academic quality in diverse linguistic environments.

Key insights

  • Universities frequently employ student evaluations of teaching (SETs) across different language tracks.
  • Meaningful interpretation of SETs across groups requires evidence of comparable survey function.
  • The study examined a 49-item Course Evaluation Survey (CES) in a teacher-preparation program in the UAE.
  • Data was collected from 528 students (229 Arabic-track and 299 English-track).
  • Both Arabic-medium and English-medium tracks had equivalent learning outcomes, content, assignments, assessments, and objectives, differing primarily in language of instruction and survey administration.
  • Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis and differential item functioning (DIF) were used to test measurement invariance.

Source

Frontiers in Education — https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1917639

Citation

Cite the original work (APA 7)

The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.

Verification

This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.

Verification ID
ASA-EXE-2026-00285
Version
v1.0 · r0
Issued
8 September 2026
Resource prepared by
Aziz Shuaib Ausi
Resource status
Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
Underlying work
Comparability of student evaluations of teaching across Arabic- and English-medium higher education tracks: measurement invariance evidence from the UAE
Original authors
Attribution requires verification
Original source
Frontiers in Education
Provenance status
Attribution requires verification
Rights
Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.

This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.

Verify this resource