Executive Guide
Who Delegates to AI? Evidence from 53,000 Agent Configurations
- Author
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Published
- 28 August 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
Executive Summary
Recent research introduces a new metric, 'delegated exposure,' to assess the actual adoption of AI by workers, rather than just the potential for AI to perform tasks. This metric, operationalized as the Agentic Adoption Index (AAI), measures how closely an occupation's tasks align with AI agent routines already built and shared by practitioners. The study leveraged approximately 53,000 AI agent skill specifications and 18,000 O*NET task statements to develop this index.
Recent research introduces a new metric, 'delegated exposure,' to assess the actual adoption of AI by workers, rather than just the potential for AI to perform tasks. This metric, operationalized as the Agentic Adoption Index (AAI), measures how closely an occupation's tasks align with AI agent routines already built and shared by practitioners. The study leveraged approximately 53,000 AI agent skill specifications and 18,000 O*NET task statements to develop this index.
Why it matters
Understanding the actual adoption of AI through 'delegated exposure' is critical for strategic workforce planning and technological investment decisions. It shifts the focus from theoretical AI applicability to empirical AI integration, providing a more accurate picture of human-AI collaboration and its impact on productivity and organizational structures.
Key insights
- Traditional measures of AI exposure indicate where AI could perform tasks, but not whether workers have actually adopted it.
- The concept of 'delegated exposure' quantifies instances where a worker has integrated AI into their workflow to perform a task.
- The Agentic Adoption Index (AAI) is proposed to measure delegated exposure by comparing occupation tasks to existing AI agent routines.
- The study analyzed 53,000 agent skill specifications from the Manus Skills Marketplace against 18,000 O*NET task statements.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20425
Related publications
Previous
Testing and Evaluation of Agentic AI Systems In Military Command and Control
Next
Exploratory As-Analyzed No-Detection of Culturally-Marked Predicate-Triggered PII Amplification in a Synthetic-English RAG Probe: A Predicate-Resource-Confounded Audit
Embedding inter- and transdisciplinary sustainability skills and knowledge development in higher education: perspectives from an innovative new degree
Executive Guide
Critical thinking as a predictor of task functionality and artificial intelligence use among university students. A PLS-SEM approach
Executive Guide
Cognitive emotion regulation as a statistical mediator of the association between autistic traits and academic performance in university students
Executive Guide
AI self-efficacy as a predictor of satisfaction with studies: the mediating role of research motivation among Peruvian University students
Executive Guide
Generative AI and linguistic creativity in digitally multilingual higher education
Executive Guide
Digital teaching and learning strategies for enhancing self-directed learning in remote ODeL environments: evidence from Zimbabwe Open University
Executive Guide
Download & citation
Cite this publication (APA 7)
Aziz Shuaib Ausi (2026). Who Delegates to AI? Evidence from 53,000 Agent Configurations. Executive Guide. Aziz Shuaib Ausi. https://www.azizshuaib.com/verify/ASA-EXG-2026-00653
Verification
This is an authenticated institutional record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00653
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 28 August 2026
- Publisher
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Licence
- All rights reserved. Reproduction requires written permission.