Executive Guide
Research Summary: Who Delegates to AI? Evidence from 53,000 Agent Configurations
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 28 August 2026
- Last updated
- 8 October 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
Recent research introduces a new metric, 'delegated exposure,' to assess the actual adoption of AI by workers, rather than just the potential for AI to perform tasks. This metric, operationalized as the Agentic Adoption Index (AAI), measures how closely an occupation's tasks align with AI agent routines already built and shared by practitioners. The study leveraged approximately 53,000 AI agent skill specifications and 18,000 O*NET task statements to develop this index.
Why it matters
Understanding the actual adoption of AI through 'delegated exposure' is critical for strategic workforce planning and technological investment decisions. It shifts the focus from theoretical AI applicability to empirical AI integration, providing a more accurate picture of human-AI collaboration and its impact on productivity and organizational structures.
Key insights
- Traditional measures of AI exposure indicate where AI could perform tasks, but not whether workers have actually adopted it.
- The concept of 'delegated exposure' quantifies instances where a worker has integrated AI into their workflow to perform a task.
- The Agentic Adoption Index (AAI) is proposed to measure delegated exposure by comparing occupation tasks to existing AI agent routines.
- The study analyzed 53,000 agent skill specifications from the Manus Skills Marketplace against 18,000 O*NET task statements.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20425
Related intelligence and resources
Previous
Testing and Evaluation of Agentic AI Systems In Military Command and Control
Next
Exploratory As-Analyzed No-Detection of Culturally-Marked Predicate-Triggered PII Amplification in a Synthetic-English RAG Probe: A Predicate-Resource-Confounded Audit
Transformative play: integrating outdoor adventure education and the NPI-cycle to facilitate transformative experience
Executive Guide
Cybersecurity Threat Delays Start of Classes at UT San Antonio
Executive Guide
Towards the determination of competencies of the commercial engineer in Chile
Executive Guide
From Atari to EVE Online: Building on 15 Years of AI Research in Games
Executive Guide
Bankrupt Saint Augustine’s Will Not Offer Fall Classes
Executive Guide
Cornell Hopes to Turn Cheating Into Teachable Moment
Executive Guide
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00653
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 28 August 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- Who Delegates to AI? Evidence from 53,000 Agent Configurations
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.