Executive Guide
Understanding Computing Identity Development Through Mentorship and Epistemic Network Analysis
- Author
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Published
- August 19, 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
Executive Summary
A research study explored how computing identity develops among students in computing-related fields, utilizing open-ended survey responses from 37 participants. The study applied Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) to model the co-occurrence of six identity-related constructs. A key focus was comparing identity narratives between individuals who reported mentorship support and those who did not, finding distinct structural patterns based on mentorship presence.
A research study explored how computing identity develops among students in computing-related fields, utilizing open-ended survey responses from 37 participants. The study applied Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) to model the co-occurrence of six identity-related constructs. A key focus was comparing identity narratives between individuals who reported mentorship support and those who did not, finding distinct structural patterns based on mentorship presence.
Why it matters
Understanding the factors influencing computing identity, particularly the role of mentorship, is crucial for fostering engagement and retention in technical fields. This insight can inform strategies to enhance participation and belonging, thereby strengthening the talent pipeline for critical sectors dependent on computing expertise.
Key insights
- Computing identity significantly influences student participation, persistence, and sense of belonging in computing disciplines.
- Traditional survey measures may not fully capture the complexity of identity development.
- The study used open-ended survey responses from 37 participants in computing-related fields.
- Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) was employed to model co-occurrence patterns among six identity constructs: recognition, interest, competence, sense of belonging, self-doubt, and imposter syndrome.
- Distinct differences were observed in the structure of computing identity narratives between participants who received mentorship support and those who did not.
- The study's findings demonstrate the utility of quantitative ethnography for understanding complex identity formation.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16904
Related publications
Previous
The politics of postmortem privacy
Next
Education-centered critical policy analysis of AI: Ghana's AI strategy as a case
WIP: LLM Odyssey: A Game-Based Platform for Teaching LLM Engineering Concepts
Executive Guide
An Investigation of the NeurIPS and ICML 2025 Position Tracks
Executive Guide
Which CS1 Students Will Fail? Identifying Digital Markers from Learning Analytics in Computer Systems and Architecture Using Weighted Academic Momentum and Interaction Logs
Executive Guide
What Makes a Fairness Gap Actionable? Statistical Actionability for Responsible AI Deployment
Executive Guide
Education-centered critical policy analysis of AI: Ghana's AI strategy as a case
Executive Guide
The politics of postmortem privacy
Executive Guide
Download & citation
Cite this publication (APA 7)
Aziz Shuaib Ausi (2026). Understanding Computing Identity Development Through Mentorship and Epistemic Network Analysis. Executive Guide. Aziz Shuaib Ausi. https://www.azizshuaib.com/verify/ASA-EXG-2026-00449
Verification
This is an authenticated institutional record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00449
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 8/19/2026
- Publisher
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Licence
- All rights reserved. Reproduction requires written permission.