Executive Guide
Research Summary: Understanding Computing Identity Development Through Mentorship and Epistemic Network Analysis
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 19 August 2026
- Last updated
- 22 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
A research study explored how computing identity develops among students in computing-related fields, utilizing open-ended survey responses from 37 participants. The study applied Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) to model the co-occurrence of six identity-related constructs. A key focus was comparing identity narratives between individuals who reported mentorship support and those who did not, finding distinct structural patterns based on mentorship presence.
Why it matters
Understanding the factors influencing computing identity, particularly the role of mentorship, is crucial for fostering engagement and retention in technical fields. This insight can inform strategies to enhance participation and belonging, thereby strengthening the talent pipeline for critical sectors dependent on computing expertise.
Key insights
- Computing identity significantly influences student participation, persistence, and sense of belonging in computing disciplines.
- Traditional survey measures may not fully capture the complexity of identity development.
- The study used open-ended survey responses from 37 participants in computing-related fields.
- Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) was employed to model co-occurrence patterns among six identity constructs: recognition, interest, competence, sense of belonging, self-doubt, and imposter syndrome.
- Distinct differences were observed in the structure of computing identity narratives between participants who received mentorship support and those who did not.
- The study's findings demonstrate the utility of quantitative ethnography for understanding complex identity formation.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16904
Related intelligence and resources
Previous
The politics of postmortem privacy
Next
Education-centered critical policy analysis of AI: Ghana's AI strategy as a case
Transformative play: integrating outdoor adventure education and the NPI-cycle to facilitate transformative experience
Executive Guide
Cybersecurity Threat Delays Start of Classes at UT San Antonio
Executive Guide
Towards the determination of competencies of the commercial engineer in Chile
Executive Guide
From Atari to EVE Online: Building on 15 Years of AI Research in Games
Executive Guide
Bankrupt Saint Augustine’s Will Not Offer Fall Classes
Executive Guide
Cornell Hopes to Turn Cheating Into Teachable Moment
Executive Guide
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00449
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 19 August 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- Understanding Computing Identity Development Through Mentorship and Epistemic Network Analysis
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.