Skip to main content
1 min readExecutive Guide

Executive Guide

Research Summary: Understanding Computing Identity Development Through Mentorship and Epistemic Network Analysis

Original authors
Attribution requires verification
Original source
arXiv — Computers and Society
Summary & Analysis prepared by
Aziz Shuaib Ausi
Resource type
Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
Resource published on AZIZ OS
19 August 2026
Last updated
22 September 2026
Reading time
1 min
Publication type
Executive Guide
Availability
Open access
About this Summary & Analysis

AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.

Checking access…

A research study explored how computing identity develops among students in computing-related fields, utilizing open-ended survey responses from 37 participants. The study applied Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) to model the co-occurrence of six identity-related constructs. A key focus was comparing identity narratives between individuals who reported mentorship support and those who did not, finding distinct structural patterns based on mentorship presence.

Why it matters

Understanding the factors influencing computing identity, particularly the role of mentorship, is crucial for fostering engagement and retention in technical fields. This insight can inform strategies to enhance participation and belonging, thereby strengthening the talent pipeline for critical sectors dependent on computing expertise.

Key insights

  • Computing identity significantly influences student participation, persistence, and sense of belonging in computing disciplines.
  • Traditional survey measures may not fully capture the complexity of identity development.
  • The study used open-ended survey responses from 37 participants in computing-related fields.
  • Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) was employed to model co-occurrence patterns among six identity constructs: recognition, interest, competence, sense of belonging, self-doubt, and imposter syndrome.
  • Distinct differences were observed in the structure of computing identity narratives between participants who received mentorship support and those who did not.
  • The study's findings demonstrate the utility of quantitative ethnography for understanding complex identity formation.

Source

arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16904

Citation

Cite the original work (APA 7)

The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.

Verification

This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.

Verification ID
ASA-EXG-2026-00449
Version
v1.0 · r0
Issued
19 August 2026
Resource prepared by
Aziz Shuaib Ausi
Resource status
Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
Underlying work
Understanding Computing Identity Development Through Mentorship and Epistemic Network Analysis
Original authors
Attribution requires verification
Original source
arXiv — Computers and Society
Provenance status
Attribution requires verification
Rights
Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.

This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.

Verify this resource