1 min readExecutive Guide

Executive Guide

Understanding Computing Identity Development Through Mentorship and Epistemic Network Analysis

Author
Aziz Shuaib Ausi
Published
August 19, 2026
Reading time
1 min
Publication type
Executive Guide
Availability
Open access

Executive Summary

A research study explored how computing identity develops among students in computing-related fields, utilizing open-ended survey responses from 37 participants. The study applied Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) to model the co-occurrence of six identity-related constructs. A key focus was comparing identity narratives between individuals who reported mentorship support and those who did not, finding distinct structural patterns based on mentorship presence.

Checking access…

A research study explored how computing identity develops among students in computing-related fields, utilizing open-ended survey responses from 37 participants. The study applied Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) to model the co-occurrence of six identity-related constructs. A key focus was comparing identity narratives between individuals who reported mentorship support and those who did not, finding distinct structural patterns based on mentorship presence.

Why it matters

Understanding the factors influencing computing identity, particularly the role of mentorship, is crucial for fostering engagement and retention in technical fields. This insight can inform strategies to enhance participation and belonging, thereby strengthening the talent pipeline for critical sectors dependent on computing expertise.

Key insights

  • Computing identity significantly influences student participation, persistence, and sense of belonging in computing disciplines.
  • Traditional survey measures may not fully capture the complexity of identity development.
  • The study used open-ended survey responses from 37 participants in computing-related fields.
  • Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) was employed to model co-occurrence patterns among six identity constructs: recognition, interest, competence, sense of belonging, self-doubt, and imposter syndrome.
  • Distinct differences were observed in the structure of computing identity narratives between participants who received mentorship support and those who did not.
  • The study's findings demonstrate the utility of quantitative ethnography for understanding complex identity formation.

Source

arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16904

Download & citation

Cite this publication (APA 7)

Aziz Shuaib Ausi (2026). Understanding Computing Identity Development Through Mentorship and Epistemic Network Analysis. Executive Guide. Aziz Shuaib Ausi. https://www.azizshuaib.com/verify/ASA-EXG-2026-00449

Verification

This is an authenticated institutional record.

Verification ID
ASA-EXG-2026-00449
Version
v1.0 · r0
Issued
8/19/2026
Publisher
Aziz Shuaib Ausi
Licence
All rights reserved. Reproduction requires written permission.

Verify this publication