Skip to main content
1 min readExecutive Guide

Executive Guide · Open access

Research Summary: Two-Phase Simulated Annealing for Equitable Team Formation: Eliminating Complaints in Large Engineering Cohorts

Original authors
Attribution requires verification
Original source
arXiv — Computers and Society
Summary & Analysis prepared by
Aziz Shuaib Ausi
Resource type
Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
Resource published on AZIZ OS
12 August 2026
Last updated
22 September 2026
Reading time
1 min
Publication type
Executive Guide
Availability
Open access
About this Summary & Analysis

AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.

Checking access…

A novel two-phase algorithmic approach utilizing simulated annealing has been developed to optimize team formation in large cohorts. This method effectively balances student preferences and fairness objectives, aiming to eliminate complaints. It addresses a gap in existing tools that either prioritize fairness over preferences or vice-versa, specifically in educational settings for engineering students.

Why it matters

This research provides a solution to a common operational challenge in managing large groups, particularly where individual preferences and equitable distribution of resources or opportunities are critical. Effective team formation can significantly improve satisfaction, reduce administrative burden, and potentially enhance outcomes by fostering more cohesive and balanced groups.

Key insights

  • A new two-phase algorithmic method decouples preference satisfaction from fairness optimization in team formation.
  • The method employs simulated annealing, a technique from materials science, applied to an educational challenge.
  • Existing team formation tools often compromise either student preferences or fairness/balance, leading to high complaint rates.
  • The new approach aims to achieve both preference satisfaction and fairness without compromise, demonstrating pedagogical integration of administrative processes.
  • The problem is particularly relevant for large engineering cohorts (100+ students) where balancing preferences, fairness, and diversity is complex.

Source

arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.07270

Citation

Cite the original work (APA 7)

The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.

Verification

This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.

Verification ID
ASA-EXG-2026-00195
Version
v1.0 · r0
Issued
12 August 2026
Resource prepared by
Aziz Shuaib Ausi
Resource status
Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
Underlying work
Two-Phase Simulated Annealing for Equitable Team Formation: Eliminating Complaints in Large Engineering Cohorts
Original authors
Attribution requires verification
Original source
arXiv — Computers and Society
Provenance status
Attribution requires verification
Rights
Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.

This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.

Verify this resource