Executive Guide
Research Summary: The role of information technologies in optimising pedagogical processes and achieving educational goals
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 27 August 2026
- Last updated
- 21 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
A study conducted within a Faculty of Education investigated the impact of integrating digital technologies, specifically Moodle, Google Docs, and Jamboard, into pedagogical processes. The research found a statistically significant positive association between the use of these IT tools and improved student engagement and learning outcomes.
Why it matters
This research highlights the potential of information technologies to significantly enhance educational processes and achieve learning objectives. Understanding the direct impact of specific digital tools on student engagement and outcomes is crucial for strategic planning in educational institutions aiming to optimize their pedagogical approaches and resource allocation.
Key insights
- The study aimed to assess the association between digital technology integration and student learning outcomes, motivation, and cognitive development.
- A quasi-experimental pedagogical design was used, involving pre- and post-test data, surveys, and comparative analysis between experimental (38 students) and control (37 students) groups.
- Statistically significant positive changes were observed following the implementation of Moodle, Google Docs, and Jamboard.
- The use of these specific IT tools was associated with increased student engagement and improved learning outcomes.
Source
Frontiers in Education — https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1893601
Related intelligence and resources
Previous
‘It's here and we can't fight it’: engineering faculty perceptions of generative AI, student use, and the future of engineering education
Next
Student well-being: an integral definition and conceptual framework
Transformative play: integrating outdoor adventure education and the NPI-cycle to facilitate transformative experience
Executive Guide
Cybersecurity Threat Delays Start of Classes at UT San Antonio
Executive Guide
Towards the determination of competencies of the commercial engineer in Chile
Executive Guide
From Atari to EVE Online: Building on 15 Years of AI Research in Games
Executive Guide
Bankrupt Saint Augustine’s Will Not Offer Fall Classes
Executive Guide
Cornell Hopes to Turn Cheating Into Teachable Moment
Executive Guide
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00525
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 27 August 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- The role of information technologies in optimising pedagogical processes and achieving educational goals
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.