Executive Guide
Research Summary: Technology, education and critical media literacy: potential, challenges, and opportunities
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 12 August 2026
- Last updated
- 21 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
A recent study investigates the impact of technology on media education, media literacy, and educommunication, with a focus on developing critical competencies and critical media literacy. The research, based on interviews with experts and a survey of university students, highlights how technological advancements contribute to challenges such as disinformation, fake news, incidental information exposure, and deepfakes, while also presenting educational opportunities.
Why it matters
The pervasive influence of technology on information consumption and the rise of complex challenges like deepfakes and disinformation necessitate a strategic re-evaluation of educational approaches. Cultivating critical media literacy is crucial for individuals to navigate increasingly complex information environments, impacting decision-making across all levels of society.
Key insights
- Technology significantly influences media education, media literacy, and educommunication.
- The study explores perceptions of these fields among both students and academic experts.
- A primary focus is on the development of critical competencies and critical media literacy.
- Technological advances are linked to challenges in information consumption, including disinformation, fake news, incidental exposure, and deepfakes.
- These challenges are concurrently viewed as opportunities within educational contexts.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.10778
Related intelligence and resources
Previous
The Deliberative Deficit: An Empirical Critique of LLMs in Democratic Discourse
Next
Mediatised Participation: Citizen Journalism and the Decline in User-Generated Content in Online News Media
Transformative play: integrating outdoor adventure education and the NPI-cycle to facilitate transformative experience
Executive Guide
Cybersecurity Threat Delays Start of Classes at UT San Antonio
Executive Guide
Towards the determination of competencies of the commercial engineer in Chile
Executive Guide
From Atari to EVE Online: Building on 15 Years of AI Research in Games
Executive Guide
Bankrupt Saint Augustine’s Will Not Offer Fall Classes
Executive Guide
Cornell Hopes to Turn Cheating Into Teachable Moment
Executive Guide
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00181
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 12 August 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- Technology, education and critical media literacy: potential, challenges, and opportunities
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.