Executive Guide
Regulatory Approval Is Not Enough: Gaps in Trustworthy AI Reporting in FDA-Cleared Medical Devices
- Author
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Published
- August 14, 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
Executive Summary
Research indicates significant gaps in the publicly available regulatory documentation for AI/ML-enabled medical devices, specifically concerning the reporting of 'trustworthy AI' principles. An analysis of FDA summary reports for devices cleared between 2021 and 2025 found insufficient evidence to independently assess crucial dimensions of trustworthiness, despite the increasing integration of these systems into clinical decision-making.
Research indicates significant gaps in the publicly available regulatory documentation for AI/ML-enabled medical devices, specifically concerning the reporting of 'trustworthy AI' principles. An analysis of FDA summary reports for devices cleared between 2021 and 2025 found insufficient evidence to independently assess crucial dimensions of trustworthiness, despite the increasing integration of these systems into clinical decision-making.
Why it matters
The lack of comprehensive public reporting on AI trustworthiness in regulated medical devices poses a significant challenge to fostering confidence in these technologies. Addressing these transparency gaps is critical for maintaining public trust, ensuring patient safety, and facilitating the responsible adoption of AI in sensitive sectors.
Key insights
- AI/ML-enabled medical devices are increasingly deployed in healthcare, operating within evolving regulatory frameworks.
- There is a growing expectation for these systems to demonstrate 'trustworthy AI' dimensions to build confidence among clinicians, patients, and the public.
- Analysis of FDA AI/ML-enabled medical device summary reports from 2021-2025 revealed that publicly available documentation often lacks sufficient evidence.
- The identified gaps hinder the independent assessment of the trustworthiness of cleared AI systems, particularly against established principles like FUTURE-AI.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12360
Related publications
Previous
Assessment Design in the GenAI Era: The X1-X2-X3 Assessment Pattern for Testing Students' AI Literacy, Learning Outcomes, and Reflection
Next
Why AI Governance Frameworks Are Hard to Adopt: A Role-Based Stress Test of the NIST AI RMF
MOSAIC: Unveiling the Moral, Social and Individual Dimensions of Large Language Models
Executive Guide
Position: The Alignment Community is Unintentionally Building a Censor's Toolkit
Executive Guide
Follow the Norm: Accounting for Fine-Tuning and Prompt Effects on Model Rationales
Executive Guide
EU-ETS under attack? The impact of carbon price suppression on the decarbonization of the power sector
Executive Guide
The Use of Learning Management Systems for Self-paced Learning: The Case at a South African Public Access Centre
Executive Guide
Measuring Curriculum-Labor Market Alignment at the Scale of a Program Portfolio
Executive Guide
Download & citation
Cite this publication (APA 7)
Aziz Shuaib Ausi (2026). Regulatory Approval Is Not Enough: Gaps in Trustworthy AI Reporting in FDA-Cleared Medical Devices. Executive Guide. Aziz Shuaib Ausi. https://www.azizshuaib.com/verify/ASA-EXG-2026-00281
Verification
This is an authenticated institutional record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00281
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 8/14/2026
- Publisher
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Licence
- All rights reserved. Reproduction requires written permission.