Executive Guide
Research Summary: Regulation, Power, and the Compliance 1 Paradox: A Longitudinal Study of Smart Homes
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 17 August 2026
- Last updated
- 22 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
A longitudinal study, building on previous research, is being conducted on smart home technology adoption in Jordan. This research aims to understand the implications of smart homes for power dynamics, privacy, and inequality within domestic environments, specifically examining how cultural norms, regulatory frameworks, and daily technological practices influence these factors.
Why it matters
This research is strategically important as it sheds light on the socio-technical implications of smart home adoption, particularly regarding power, privacy, and inequality. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for developing effective regulatory frameworks and policies that address the challenges and opportunities presented by ubiquitous technology in domestic settings.
Key insights
- Smart home technologies are increasingly integrated into domestic environments.
- The implications of smart home technologies for power, privacy, and inequality are not yet fully understood, particularly in non-Western contexts.
- Cultural norms, regulatory frameworks, and everyday technological practices are key factors shaping domestic power dynamics in relation to smart homes.
- The study employs a two-phase grounded theory approach, including secondary analysis of existing interviews and new interviews conducted in 2025.
- Participants in the study include household members, domestic workers, policymakers, and civil society advocates.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13582
Related intelligence and resources
Previous
Implementing Computational Law in Wolfram Language for the Governance of Artificial Intelligence
Next
INSIDE the Student's Mind: Jointly Modeling Latent Reasoning and Action in LLM Student Simulators
Transformative play: integrating outdoor adventure education and the NPI-cycle to facilitate transformative experience
Executive Guide
Cybersecurity Threat Delays Start of Classes at UT San Antonio
Executive Guide
Towards the determination of competencies of the commercial engineer in Chile
Executive Guide
From Atari to EVE Online: Building on 15 Years of AI Research in Games
Executive Guide
Bankrupt Saint Augustine’s Will Not Offer Fall Classes
Executive Guide
Cornell Hopes to Turn Cheating Into Teachable Moment
Executive Guide
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00349
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 17 August 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- Regulation, Power, and the Compliance 1 Paradox: A Longitudinal Study of Smart Homes
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.