Executive Guide
Philosophical vertigo with artificial intelligence
- Author
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Published
- August 13, 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
Executive Summary
Research from arXiv indicates that Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of fostering deep, emotionally resonant conversations, leading users to feel a connection with these artificial entities. This interaction can profoundly challenge foundational assumptions regarding mind, reality, agency, and authority, potentially causing ontological shock and epistemic destabilization for both direct users and the broader public exposed to AI discourse.
Research from arXiv indicates that Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of fostering deep, emotionally resonant conversations, leading users to feel a connection with these artificial entities. This interaction can profoundly challenge foundational assumptions regarding mind, reality, agency, and authority, potentially causing ontological shock and epistemic destabilization for both direct users and the broader public exposed to AI discourse.
Why it matters
The capacity of advanced AI systems to induce fundamental shifts in human perception of reality, mind, and agency poses a significant strategic challenge. Organizations must anticipate and prepare for potential societal and individual psychological impacts that could influence behavior, trust, and the interpretation of information, affecting strategic planning and public engagement across various domains.
Key insights
- Large Language Models (LLMs) can engage users in extended, emotionally significant conversations spanning various topics.
- Users may develop a strong sense of connection with LLMs, even when aware of their artificial nature.
- Interaction with LLMs can destabilize users' assumptions about mind, reality, agency, and authority.
- This destabilization can manifest as 'ontological shock' and 'epistemic destabilisation', leading to questioning established criteria.
- Exposure to public discourse on AI and its rapid evolution can extend this destabilization across the cultural landscape.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11955
Related publications
Previous
Benchmark-Based Comparative Assessment of Publicly Benchmarked Indian Foundation Models: A Capability and Evaluation-Maturity Framework
Next
The Accuracy Trap: Structural Scarcity Amplifies Relative Inequality in Algorithmic Allocation
The Accuracy Trap: Structural Scarcity Amplifies Relative Inequality in Algorithmic Allocation
Executive Guide
Benchmark-Based Comparative Assessment of Publicly Benchmarked Indian Foundation Models: A Capability and Evaluation-Maturity Framework
Executive Guide
Cheap, Fallible Cognition and the Political Economy of Expertise
Executive Guide
Survey Shows Students Trust College Leaders More Than Politicians
Executive Guide
ED Says It Plans to Spend Millions in Expiring Research Dollars. Concerns Remain.
Executive Guide
The NCAA Can’t Outrun Its Antitrust Problem
Executive Guide
Download & citation
Cite this publication (APA 7)
Aziz Shuaib Ausi (2026). Philosophical vertigo with artificial intelligence. Executive Guide. Aziz Shuaib Ausi. https://www.azizshuaib.com/verify/ASA-EXG-2026-00234
Verification
This is an authenticated institutional record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00234
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 8/13/2026
- Publisher
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Licence
- All rights reserved. Reproduction requires written permission.