Executive Guide
Research Summary: Philosophical vertigo with artificial intelligence
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 13 August 2026
- Last updated
- 21 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
Research from arXiv indicates that Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of fostering deep, emotionally resonant conversations, leading users to feel a connection with these artificial entities. This interaction can profoundly challenge foundational assumptions regarding mind, reality, agency, and authority, potentially causing ontological shock and epistemic destabilization for both direct users and the broader public exposed to AI discourse.
Why it matters
The capacity of advanced AI systems to induce fundamental shifts in human perception of reality, mind, and agency poses a significant strategic challenge. Organizations must anticipate and prepare for potential societal and individual psychological impacts that could influence behavior, trust, and the interpretation of information, affecting strategic planning and public engagement across various domains.
Key insights
- Large Language Models (LLMs) can engage users in extended, emotionally significant conversations spanning various topics.
- Users may develop a strong sense of connection with LLMs, even when aware of their artificial nature.
- Interaction with LLMs can destabilize users' assumptions about mind, reality, agency, and authority.
- This destabilization can manifest as 'ontological shock' and 'epistemic destabilisation', leading to questioning established criteria.
- Exposure to public discourse on AI and its rapid evolution can extend this destabilization across the cultural landscape.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11955
Related intelligence and resources
Previous
Benchmark-Based Comparative Assessment of Publicly Benchmarked Indian Foundation Models: A Capability and Evaluation-Maturity Framework
Next
The Accuracy Trap: Structural Scarcity Amplifies Relative Inequality in Algorithmic Allocation
Transformative play: integrating outdoor adventure education and the NPI-cycle to facilitate transformative experience
Executive Guide
Cybersecurity Threat Delays Start of Classes at UT San Antonio
Executive Guide
Towards the determination of competencies of the commercial engineer in Chile
Executive Guide
From Atari to EVE Online: Building on 15 Years of AI Research in Games
Executive Guide
Bankrupt Saint Augustine’s Will Not Offer Fall Classes
Executive Guide
Cornell Hopes to Turn Cheating Into Teachable Moment
Executive Guide
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00234
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 13 August 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- Philosophical vertigo with artificial intelligence
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.