Knowledge Resource
Research Summary: Perceived educational value, ethical risk, and support for responsible AI governance in higher education: an embedded mixed-methods study
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 28 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Knowledge Resource
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
A research study explored the relationship between perceived educational value (PEV) of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), AI ethical risk perception (AERP), and support for responsible AI governance (RAGS) among higher education stakeholders. The study utilized an embedded mixed-methods design, combining quantitative Likert-scale data and qualitative open-ended responses from a structured questionnaire, to understand the factors influencing stakeholder support for institutional GenAI governance.
Why it matters
The increasing integration of GenAI into critical domains such as education necessitates a robust understanding of stakeholder perspectives on its governance. Addressing perceived value and ethical risks is crucial for developing sustainable and broadly supported governance frameworks for emerging technologies, impacting adoption, regulation, and public trust.
Key insights
- Generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly integrated into higher education assessment practices.
- Perceptual factors influencing stakeholder support for GenAI governance in higher education are not well understood.
- The study investigated the association between stakeholders' perceived educational value of GenAI and their support for responsible AI governance.
- The study also examined the link between stakeholders' perception of ethical risks associated with AI and their support for responsible AI governance.
- A mixed-methods approach, including quantitative and qualitative data, was used to contextualize and deepen interpretations of these relationships.
Source
Frontiers in Education — https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1926201
Related intelligence and resources
Previous
Problem solving and responsible GenAI use in assessment: students’ reported experiences in open and distance learning
Next
Concrete reading theory: embodied anchors for early literacy in digital contexts
School leadership mentoring across four European educational contexts: an exploratory qualitative study
Knowledge Resource
Concrete reading theory: embodied anchors for early literacy in digital contexts
Knowledge Resource
Problem solving and responsible GenAI use in assessment: students’ reported experiences in open and distance learning
Knowledge Resource
Teaching coherence and cohesion to Chinese EFL undergraduates: a concept-based classroom intervention
Knowledge Resource
Design and evaluation of a novel digital teaching and learning process for higher education: a proof-of-concept study
Knowledge Resource
Anonymous Donor Gives University of Richmond $150M
Knowledge Resource
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXE-2026-00980
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 28 September 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- Perceived educational value, ethical risk, and support for responsible AI governance in higher education: an embedded mixed-methods study
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.