Executive Guide
Research Summary: Large Language Models Explain Experts Better Than Experts Themselves
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 11 August 2026
- Last updated
- 22 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
A recent study investigates the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to externalize tacit knowledge from expert behaviors. The research indicates that LLM-generated knowledge can enhance decision-making quality and enable novices to achieve near-expert performance. This suggests a significant potential for LLMs in knowledge transfer and retention, addressing the long-standing challenge of articulating and preserving expert 'know-how'.
Why it matters
The ability of LLMs to externalize and transfer tacit knowledge has profound implications for organizational learning, workforce development, and operational efficiency. It offers a potential solution to the critical problem of knowledge loss when experienced personnel depart, enabling more robust knowledge management strategies.
Key insights
- Tacit knowledge, the 'know-how' derived from experience, is inherently difficult for experts to articulate and often poorly documented.
- The study explored whether LLMs can externalize tacit knowledge from observed expert behaviors.
- LLM-externalized tacit knowledge improved the quality of downstream decision-making.
- Novices utilizing LLM-externalized knowledge approached expert-level performance.
- LLM-externalized knowledge often surpassed the effectiveness of knowledge articulated by human experts.
- These findings offer empirical support for Polanyi's Paradox, which posits that 'we can know more than we can tell'.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07488
Related intelligence and resources
Previous
How sensitive do we want AI to be? Socio-communicative competencies of large language models in healthcare
Next
AI-AI co-creation outperforms human pairs in creative tasks
Transformative play: integrating outdoor adventure education and the NPI-cycle to facilitate transformative experience
Executive Guide
Cybersecurity Threat Delays Start of Classes at UT San Antonio
Executive Guide
Towards the determination of competencies of the commercial engineer in Chile
Executive Guide
From Atari to EVE Online: Building on 15 Years of AI Research in Games
Executive Guide
Bankrupt Saint Augustine’s Will Not Offer Fall Classes
Executive Guide
Cornell Hopes to Turn Cheating Into Teachable Moment
Executive Guide
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00127
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 11 August 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- Large Language Models Explain Experts Better Than Experts Themselves
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.