Executive Guide · Open access
Research Summary: Knowing intervention needs through the intersection of dropout factors and the CASEL framework: a case study of a tribal village in India
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 13 August 2026
- Last updated
- 22 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
A study conducted in a tribal village in India utilized a participatory research process to address school dropout rates. The research mapped community insights regarding dropout factors against the CASEL (Collaborative, Academic, Social and Emotional Learning) framework to develop a sustainable intervention design. This approach involved multiple stakeholder groups, aiming to create an appropriate solution for dropout reduction.
Why it matters
Addressing dropout rates is critical for fostering human capital development and societal stability. The methodology of integrating community-specific insights with established educational frameworks offers a scalable approach for developing contextually relevant and sustainable intervention strategies in education.
Key insights
- A primary obstacle to sustainable dropout reduction is the absence of suitable intervention designs.
- Participatory research methods can inform the development of effective, sustainable solutions.
- Community insights into dropout factors can be effectively integrated with established frameworks like CASEL to guide intervention design.
- Engagement of diverse stakeholder groups, including village leadership, parents, youth, and students, is integral to participatory research in this context.
Source
Frontiers in Education — https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1883169
Related resources
Previous
What makes a highly productive PhD student?
Next
Facebook as a learning node: a theoretical proposal of a private connectivist group for the collective construction of knowledge in higher education
Transformative play: integrating outdoor adventure education and the NPI-cycle to facilitate transformative experience
Executive Guide
Cybersecurity Threat Delays Start of Classes at UT San Antonio
Executive Guide
Towards the determination of competencies of the commercial engineer in Chile
Executive Guide
From Atari to EVE Online: Building on 15 Years of AI Research in Games
Executive Guide
Bankrupt Saint Augustine’s Will Not Offer Fall Classes
Executive Guide
Cornell Hopes to Turn Cheating Into Teachable Moment
Executive Guide
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00212
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 13 August 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- Knowing intervention needs through the intersection of dropout factors and the CASEL framework: a case study of a tribal village in India
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.