Knowledge Resource
Research Summary: K-12 in-service teachers' beliefs about generative AI in classrooms: insights from the United States, India, Qatar, Colombia, and the Philippines
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 25 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Knowledge Resource
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
A multi-national study across five countries reveals that K-12 in-service teachers' positive beliefs about generative AI are strongly predicted by their AI readiness, institutional support, and prior GenAI use. Conversely, concerns regarding plagiarism and creativity associated with GenAI are less influenced by these factors, instead correlating with attributional and contextual factors specific to different countries.
Why it matters
This research provides critical insights into the factors influencing K-12 teachers' perspectives on generative AI, highlighting the importance of support structures and experience. Understanding these drivers is essential for developing effective strategies for technology integration and addressing pedagogical concerns across diverse educational systems.
Key insights
- AI readiness, institutional support, and prior use are the strongest predictors of K-12 teachers' positive beliefs about generative AI in the classroom.
- These three predictors accounted for 50% of the variance in positive beliefs.
- Plagiarism and creativity concerns related to generative AI were less predicted by AI readiness, institutional support, and prior use (explaining only 6-7% of variance).
- Concerns about plagiarism and creativity were instead linked to country-specific attributional and contextual factors.
- The study involved 1,405 teachers from the United States, India, Qatar, Colombia, and the Philippines.
Source
Frontiers in Education — https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1929017
Related intelligence and resources
Previous
Project-based learning through the technology acceptance model framework: its impact on self-regulated learning of university students
Next
Transformation of the teaching role through educational automation and intelligent technologies: a systematic review
One programme, multiple countries: find joint study programmes in Europe
Knowledge Resource
Official Statistics: Pupil attendance in schools
Knowledge Resource
Accredited official statistics: Early years foundation stage profile results: 2025 to 2026
Knowledge Resource
Official Statistics: Pupil attendance in schools
Knowledge Resource
Official Statistics: Pupil attendance in schools
Knowledge Resource
Official Statistics: Pupil attendance in schools
Knowledge Resource
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXE-2026-00775
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 25 September 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- K-12 in-service teachers' beliefs about generative AI in classrooms: insights from the United States, India, Qatar, Colombia, and the Philippines
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.