Knowledge Resource
Research Summary: It Takes Three to Converse: Empirical Observations on How the Developer, the Convener and the Participant Shaped 119 Polis Conversations
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 31 August 2026
- Last updated
- 22 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Knowledge Resource
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
Analysis of 119 Polis conversations, a democratic innovation tool, reveals that the final output is significantly shaped by three distinct parties: the platform developer, the conversation convener, and the participants. Critical design choices made by the developer, such as the number of reportable groups and statement prioritization, along with the convener's initial statement framing, fundamentally influence the engagement outcomes.
Why it matters
This research highlights how platform design and initial framing significantly influence outcomes in digital citizen engagement tools. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for organizations employing technology to gather diverse perspectives and ensure the integrity and representative nature of public input processes.
Key insights
- Polis is a democratic innovation tool enabling asynchronous citizen engagement through atomic statements and 'Agree/Disagree' voting.
- The study analyzed 119 Polis conversations with over 100 participants each, drawn from a larger dataset of 271 processes.
- Three primary actors determine the output of a Polis process: the platform developer, the convener, and the participants.
- Developer design choices, such as the limitation of reported groups (2-5) and statement prioritization, restrict potential outcomes.
- The convener's role in defining the assignment and initial statements sets the conversational tone and scope.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28368
Related intelligence and resources
Previous
Generative AI Alignment with Hinduism's Theological Plurality and Sacred Representation
Next
What's on Your Mind? Exploring Privacy of Mental Health Apps
Capturing emotional engagement in classrooms: a multimodal observational analysis across classroom contexts and its association with learning outcomes
Knowledge Resource
AIgnite: an educational toolkit for supporting primary students’ AI literacy cultivation
Knowledge Resource
Measuring cognitive presence in online discussions: automated detection and instructional insights from a MOOC context
Knowledge Resource
Data science for K-12: A design-based research study
Knowledge Resource
What AI competency do K-12 teachers need? Framework construction based on teachers' work scenarios and the development and validation of a scale
Knowledge Resource
Developing a school-based evaluation framework for education for sustainable development in primary school comprehensive practical activities: integrating CIPP, GreenComp, and action research
Knowledge Resource
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXE-2026-00010
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 31 August 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- It Takes Three to Converse: Empirical Observations on How the Developer, the Convener and the Participant Shaped 119 Polis Conversations
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.