Knowledge Resource · Open access
Research Summary: Governing Artificial Intelligence as a Macro Socio-Technical Regime: The F-I-C-P Framework for Regime-Level AI Infrastructure and Governance
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 27 October 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Knowledge Resource
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
The paper introduces the F-I-C-P framework, conceptualising artificial intelligence as an emerging macro socio-technical regime driven by the interdependent dynamics of finance, infrastructure, capability, and productivity. It challenges conventional siloed perspectives by demonstrating that capital investment enables infrastructure, which in turn conditions technical capabilities, while productivity remains an unrealised possibility without proper structural alignment.
Why it matters
This framework provides decision-makers with a macro-level lens to understand that AI capability is strictly conditioned by upstream financing and physical infrastructure rather than software development alone. It clarifies why technological capability does not automatically convert into organizational or economic productivity, enabling more grounded capital allocation and governance strategies.
Key insights
- Current analyses often separate AI capability, adoption, and governance into isolated technical, organisational, or regulatory silos.
- The F-I-C-P framework demonstrates a causal chain where finance funds infrastructure, infrastructure dictates capability, and capability enables—but does not guarantee—productivity and value realization.
- The research introduces the concept of regime-level AI infrastructure to evaluate physical and systemic assets such as AI Gigafactories, foundation-model platforms, and national compute environments.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32985
Related resources
Previous
Veracity labels flip the emotional tone of language models but leave racial disparities intact
Next
LLM-as-a-Judge Version Shift: The Instrument Changed, Not the Standard
The Capability Transfer: Cohort Reversal, Codified Expertise, and the Adaptability Tax of AI Transformation
Knowledge Resource
Incremental Predictive Value of LLM Tutoring Interactions for Student Performance
Knowledge Resource
Propasafe-Hybrid: A Text-Based Hybrid Propaganda Detection Tool
Knowledge Resource
FraudSociety: A Generative Agent-Based Society for the Financial-Fraud Economy
Knowledge Resource
Cheap AI-Assisted Reverse Engineering and What It Will Do
Knowledge Resource
Automated identification of ivory carvings using machine learning: A proof-of-concept approach to detecting the illegal wildlife trade
Knowledge Resource
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXE-2026-01436
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 27 October 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- Governing Artificial Intelligence as a Macro Socio-Technical Regime: The F-I-C-P Framework for Regime-Level AI Infrastructure and Governance
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.