Executive Guide
Research Summary: Divergent paths to success: understanding the distinct predictors of retention for first-generation and continuing-generation college students
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 28 August 2026
- Last updated
- 22 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
Research indicates that the factors predicting first-year college adjustment and academic outcomes differ significantly between first-generation college students (FGCS) and continuing-generation college students (CGCS). Pre-enrollment characteristics play a distinct role in influencing the first-year transition experiences for these two groups, highlighting the need for tailored support mechanisms.
Why it matters
This research underscores the necessity of disaggregated analysis in understanding student success, revealing that one-size-fits-all approaches are insufficient. Recognizing distinct predictive pathways for different student cohorts allows institutions to develop more effective, targeted strategies for support and resource allocation, ultimately improving retention and academic outcomes.
Key insights
- First-generation college students (FGCS) encounter unique challenges within higher education.
- The study analyzed pre-enrollment survey data and first-year transition experiences from a large midwestern university.
- Pre-enrollment and first-year transition factors were identified using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.
- Multi-group structural equation modeling demonstrated that pre-enrollment characteristics predict first-year transitions differently for FGCS compared to continuing-generation college students (CGCS).
Source
Frontiers in Education — https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1900405
Related intelligence and resources
Previous
Innovative leadership in education (2020–2025): a systematic review of trends, competencies, and future directions
Next
Ethical implications of artificial intelligence-based academic integrity systems in Palestinian higher education: a systematic review
Transformative play: integrating outdoor adventure education and the NPI-cycle to facilitate transformative experience
Executive Guide
Cybersecurity Threat Delays Start of Classes at UT San Antonio
Executive Guide
Towards the determination of competencies of the commercial engineer in Chile
Executive Guide
From Atari to EVE Online: Building on 15 Years of AI Research in Games
Executive Guide
Bankrupt Saint Augustine’s Will Not Offer Fall Classes
Executive Guide
Cornell Hopes to Turn Cheating Into Teachable Moment
Executive Guide
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00581
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 28 August 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- Divergent paths to success: understanding the distinct predictors of retention for first-generation and continuing-generation college students
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- Frontiers in Education
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.