Knowledge Resource · Open access
Research Summary: Data Governance for Generative and Agentic AI : Technology, Law, Economics, and Security
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 27 October 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Knowledge Resource
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
A newly announced research volume establishes a comprehensive, unified data governance framework designed for generative AI and autonomous multi-agent systems. Integrating technological, legal, and economic lenses, the work outlines end-to-end lifecycle governance encompassing retrieval-augmented generation, data provenance, zero-trust security, cross-jurisdictional regulation across six regimes, and societal applications.
Why it matters
As generative tools evolve into autonomous agentic systems that actively act on data, fragmented risk management exposes enterprises to multi-jurisdictional compliance failures and systemic security vulnerabilities. Establishing an integrated governance framework spanning technical controls, legal mandates, and economic models is critical for deploying reliable agentic workflows at scale.
Key insights
- Proposes a unified lifecycle governance framework addressing systems that retrieve, generate, infer, remember, and act upon information.
- Synthesizes technological, legal, and economic perspectives across eleven chapters and eight appendices.
- Covers technical and operational domains including data lineage, provenance, digital trust, cybersecurity, and zero-trust architectures.
- Examines regulatory and societal dimensions, including intellectual property, global data protection laws, comparative regulation across six jurisdictions, and election integrity.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33605
Related resources
Previous
Safe by Benchmark, Unsafe in Practice: Lessons from 1331 Child-Related AI Incidents
Next
A Multimodal Framework for Measuring Creator Communication on Short-Form Video
A Battery for AI Propensity Measurement: Rubrics, Synthetic Item Banks, and Annotations
Knowledge Resource
Gender Associations in LLM-Mediated ADHD Self-Diagnosis
Knowledge Resource
A Multimodal Framework for Measuring Creator Communication on Short-Form Video
Knowledge Resource
Safe by Benchmark, Unsafe in Practice: Lessons from 1331 Child-Related AI Incidents
Knowledge Resource
The Capability Transfer: Cohort Reversal, Codified Expertise, and the Adaptability Tax of AI Transformation
Knowledge Resource
Incremental Predictive Value of LLM Tutoring Interactions for Student Performance
Knowledge Resource
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXE-2026-01447
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 27 October 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- Data Governance for Generative and Agentic AI : Technology, Law, Economics, and Security
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.