Executive Guide
Causal Inference under Interference with Learned Exposure Mappings
- Author
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Published
- 28 August 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
Executive Summary
Research investigates causal inference under interference where exposure mappings are learned rather than directly observed, focusing on environmental applications where transport processes induce these mappings. The study highlights how uncertainty in learned transport processes affects exposure mappings and subsequent spillover inference. It compares mechanistic transport models with operator-learning approaches (PDE, PINO, FNO, GeoPT) using both simulated and real-world environmental data.
Research investigates causal inference under interference where exposure mappings are learned rather than directly observed, focusing on environmental applications where transport processes induce these mappings. The study highlights how uncertainty in learned transport processes affects exposure mappings and subsequent spillover inference. It compares mechanistic transport models with operator-learning approaches (PDE, PINO, FNO, GeoPT) using both simulated and real-world environmental data.
Why it matters
This research underscores a critical challenge in causal inference for complex systems where observational data is used to derive relationships, particularly when unobserved processes influence key variables. Understanding how different modeling approaches impact the reliability of causal effect estimates is vital for robust decision-making and policy formulation in areas like environmental regulation, resource management, and public health interventions.
Key insights
- Exposure mappings in causal spillover analyses are often assumed known but frequently need to be learned from data, particularly in environmental contexts.
- Uncertainty in learned transport processes directly propagates into the derived exposure mappings and impacts downstream spillover inference.
- A comparison of mechanistic transport models with modern operator-learning approaches (PDE, PINO, FNO, GeoPT) was conducted.
- Despite similar pollution prediction accuracy across all four transport models in simulations, estimated spillover effects showed significant variance, ranging from 1.78 to 2.27.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19224
Related publications
Previous
Built for the complexity of education: AI that understands your institution
Next
Two-sided receptivity to conversational AI agents in online dating: Bilingual survey data from Fledge.Love
Predicting student churn in subscription EdTech: explainable machine learning for improving retention
Executive Guide
Constitutive vs. Corrective: A Causal Taxonomy of Human Runtime Involvement in AI Systems
Executive Guide
Generative AI Use in Entrepreneurship: An Integrative Review and an Empowerment-Entrapment Framework
Executive Guide
Are LLMs becoming similarly creative? Evidence from three years of models
Executive Guide
Aspirational Affordances of AI
Executive Guide
Two-sided receptivity to conversational AI agents in online dating: Bilingual survey data from Fledge.Love
Executive Guide
Download & citation
Cite this publication (APA 7)
Aziz Shuaib Ausi (2026). Causal Inference under Interference with Learned Exposure Mappings. Executive Guide. Aziz Shuaib Ausi. https://www.azizshuaib.com/verify/ASA-EXG-2026-00753
Verification
This is an authenticated institutional record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00753
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 28 August 2026
- Publisher
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Licence
- All rights reserved. Reproduction requires written permission.