Skip to main content
1 min readExecutive Guide

Executive Guide · Open access

Research Summary: Auditing Sex/Gender Disparities in Emergency Triage with LLM-based Paired Comparisons

Original authors
Attribution requires verification
Original source
arXiv — Computers and Society
Summary & Analysis prepared by
Aziz Shuaib Ausi
Resource type
Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
Resource published on AZIZ OS
28 August 2026
Last updated
8 October 2026
Reading time
1 min
Publication type
Executive Guide
Availability
Open access
About this Summary & Analysis

AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.

Checking access…

A research paper from arXiv introduces a novel, domain-agnostic method utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) to identify and quantify sex/gender disparities within documented clinical decision-making. This approach involves training an LLM to mimic observed decisions and then analyzing sex-swapped patient profiles where only the sex is altered. Initial application to emergency triage data from Bordeaux University Hospital and validation on MIMIC-IV datasets revealed that otherwise identical presentations were more likely to receive a lower triage priority when sex/gender was modified.

Why it matters

This research is strategically important because it provides a new, scalable method for identifying systemic biases in critical decision-making processes, particularly in domains like healthcare. Understanding and mitigating such biases is crucial for maintaining equity, improving operational integrity, and ensuring compliance with ethical and regulatory standards.

Key insights

  • A new domain-agnostic method employs LLMs to quantify sex/gender-related asymmetries in clinical decision-making.
  • The method trains an LLM to emulate existing clinical decisions and then evaluates hypothetical 'sex-swapped' pairs.
  • This approach maintains all clinical content constant, varying only the sex/gender attribute for comparison.
  • Applied to over 140,000 emergency admissions at Bordeaux University Hospital, it identified disparities.
  • Methodological portability was demonstrated by successful testing on the MIMIC-IV dataset, which represents a different language, population, and healthcare system.
  • Fine-tuning Mistral NeMo 12B for triage prediction and using Mistral Small 24B for pair generation were key technical components.
  • Preliminary findings indicate that identical clinical presentations were more likely to receive a lower triage priority under certain sex/gender assignments.

Source

arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.17124

Citation

Cite the original work (APA 7)

The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.

Verification

This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.

Verification ID
ASA-EXG-2026-00679
Version
v1.0 · r0
Issued
28 August 2026
Resource prepared by
Aziz Shuaib Ausi
Resource status
Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
Underlying work
Auditing Sex/Gender Disparities in Emergency Triage with LLM-based Paired Comparisons
Original authors
Attribution requires verification
Original source
arXiv — Computers and Society
Provenance status
Attribution requires verification
Rights
Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.

This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.

Verify this resource