Knowledge Resource · Open access
Research Summary: Anthropomorphism in the age of Large Language Models: An overview of potential risks and mitigations
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 6 October 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Knowledge Resource
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
Large Language Models (LLMs) and other Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are frequently described and perceived in human-like ways, a phenomenon termed anthropomorphism. This research synthesizes current literature on AI anthropomorphism, exploring theoretical frameworks, the influence of language, inherent risks, and potential mitigation strategies. It examines the reasons for anthropomorphizing AI, the validity of such perceptions, and the impact of linguistic framing, culminating in a conceptual taxonomy categorizing twenty-one concerns across five analytical categories.
Why it matters
The pervasive anthropomorphism of AI systems presents significant strategic challenges across sectors. Understanding its drivers and consequences is crucial for effective governance, responsible AI development, and managing public perception and trust. Addressing these issues can mitigate operational risks and ensure ethical deployment of advanced technologies.
Key insights
- AI systems, particularly LLMs, are commonly anthropomorphized through human-like descriptions and understandings.
- The research provides a synthesis of existing literature on AI anthropomorphism, covering theoretical underpinnings and practical implications.
- Linguistic framing significantly influences the anthropomorphization of AI systems.
- A conceptual taxonomy has been developed, grouping twenty-one specific risks associated with AI anthropomorphism into five analytical categories.
- The study investigates both why humans tend to anthropomorphize AI and the appropriateness of such tendencies.
- It also proposes strategies to mitigate the identified risks of anthropomorphizing machines.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38486
Related resources
Previous
SovereignNegotiation-Bench: Evaluating User-Owned Personal Agents In Delegated Bargaining Under Privacy, Consent, Evidence, And Institutional Pressure
Next
Effects of a Behavioural Commitment Scheme on Study Regularity in a Self-Paced Learning Platform
Information Operations Exploit APIs to Manipulate Social Media
Knowledge Resource
Fairness Is More Than Algorithms: Racial Disparities in Time-to-Recidivism
Knowledge Resource
Conditions for Social Trajectory Collapse: Agent-Based Simulation of Time-Geographic Trajectory Distributions
Knowledge Resource
Verifiable, Articulable, and Tacit Components of Preference
Knowledge Resource
Data Annotations as Pedagogical Hints: From Subjective Labels to Critical Thinking
Knowledge Resource
Same Performance, Different Process: Epistemic Ownership in AI-Mediated Education
Knowledge Resource
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXE-2026-01249
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 6 October 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- Anthropomorphism in the age of Large Language Models: An overview of potential risks and mitigations
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.