Skip to main content
1 min readExecutive Guide

Executive Guide

Research Summary: Advancing Inclusivity in Cybersecurity Education: Integrating Intersectionality to Enhance Student Engagement in Australian Higher Education Curriculums Strategies, Barriers, and Future Directions

Original authors
Attribution requires verification
Original source
arXiv — Computers and Society
Summary & Analysis prepared by
Aziz Shuaib Ausi
Resource type
Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
Resource published on AZIZ OS
20 August 2026
Last updated
22 September 2026
Reading time
1 min
Publication type
Executive Guide
Availability
Open access
About this Summary & Analysis

AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.

Checking access…

Research identifies that Australian women, gender-diverse individuals, and culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities are disproportionately susceptible to cybercrimes such as phishing due to factors including language barriers, limited educational access, and social isolation. These groups also face significant barriers to entering and advancing within the cybersecurity field. Current higher education cybersecurity curricula in Australia predominantly focus on technical proficiency, neglecting the crucial role of intersectionality and user-centered approaches in enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes.

Why it matters

This analysis highlights critical gaps in cybersecurity education and outreach, indicating that current approaches may not adequately protect vulnerable populations or foster a diverse cybersecurity workforce. Addressing these issues is vital for national security, economic resilience, and social equity, requiring strategic adjustments to educational policy and practice to enhance both societal protection and talent pipeline diversity.

Key insights

  • Australian women, gender-diverse individuals, and CALD communities exhibit higher susceptibility to cybercrimes due to specific vulnerabilities.
  • Contributing factors to this vulnerability include language barriers, restricted access to cybersecurity education, and social isolation.
  • These demographic groups encounter substantial obstacles in both entering and progressing within the cybersecurity profession.
  • Australian higher education cybersecurity curricula are largely uniform, emphasizing technical skills over inclusive or user-centered perspectives.
  • The current curriculum design overlooks the importance of intersectionality in boosting student engagement and learning.
  • A lack of gender inclusivity and consideration of intersectionality is a significant oversight in existing educational frameworks.

Source

arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17758

Citation

Cite the original work (APA 7)

The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.

Verification

This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.

Verification ID
ASA-EXG-2026-00456
Version
v1.0 · r0
Issued
20 August 2026
Resource prepared by
Aziz Shuaib Ausi
Resource status
Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
Underlying work
Advancing Inclusivity in Cybersecurity Education: Integrating Intersectionality to Enhance Student Engagement in Australian Higher Education Curriculums Strategies, Barriers, and Future Directions
Original authors
Attribution requires verification
Original source
arXiv — Computers and Society
Provenance status
Attribution requires verification
Rights
Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.

This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.

Verify this resource