Executive Guide
Research Summary: A Scoping Review of Methods to Measure the Energy and Carbon Footprint of Web Tracking and Advertising
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 28 August 2026
- Last updated
- 22 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
A recent scoping review of academic literature identifies five distinct methodological approaches for measuring the energy and carbon footprint associated with web tracking and advertising. Despite growing attention to the environmental impact of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector, research in this specific area remains fragmented with inconsistent terminology, highlighting a need for more unified measurement strategies.
Why it matters
Understanding and accurately measuring the environmental impact of digital activities, such as web tracking and advertising, is crucial for developing sustainable digital strategies. This research highlights the current challenges in measurement consistency, which can impede effective policy-making and corporate accountability regarding carbon emissions in the digital economy.
Key insights
- The environmental impact of web tracking and advertising is a growing concern within the broader context of the ICT sector's increasing carbon footprint.
- Academic scholarship on measuring this impact is dispersed across various disciplines and lacks consistent terminology.
- The review analyzed 15 papers, identifying five primary methodological approaches: ad blocking, controlled environment, replaying ads, traffic flow analysis, and literature-derived estimation.
- The initial structured search on Google Scholar identified 46 articles, which was refined to a final corpus of 15 papers for detailed analysis.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19495
Related intelligence and resources
Previous
A three-dimensional typology of agency for advanced AI systems
Next
Design strategies for empathetic AI robots for older adults
Transformative play: integrating outdoor adventure education and the NPI-cycle to facilitate transformative experience
Executive Guide
Cybersecurity Threat Delays Start of Classes at UT San Antonio
Executive Guide
Towards the determination of competencies of the commercial engineer in Chile
Executive Guide
From Atari to EVE Online: Building on 15 Years of AI Research in Games
Executive Guide
Bankrupt Saint Augustine’s Will Not Offer Fall Classes
Executive Guide
Cornell Hopes to Turn Cheating Into Teachable Moment
Executive Guide
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00764
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 28 August 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- A Scoping Review of Methods to Measure the Energy and Carbon Footprint of Web Tracking and Advertising
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.