Knowledge Resource
Research Summary: A Guided Inquiry Approach to Students Co-Designing Generative AI Course Policies
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Summary & Analysis prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource type
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Resource published on AZIZ OS
- 31 August 2026
- Last updated
- 29 September 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Knowledge Resource
- Availability
- Open access
About this Summary & Analysis
AZIZ OS provides independently prepared summaries and analytical interpretations of externally published research and knowledge sources. The underlying works remain attributable to their original authors and rights holders. This resource is intended to improve accessibility and understanding and does not replace the original publication.
An exploratory study examined a guided inquiry activity where students co-designed generative AI (GenAI) course policies. This approach allowed students to develop individual policy proposals focusing on ethical and appropriate GenAI use, subsequently refining them through collaborative incorporation of diverse stakeholder perspectives. The research aimed to understand students' prioritized practical factors in GenAI use policies, their justifications, and their reflections on the policy design process.
Why it matters
This research provides insights into how future generations, who will be users and developers of AI, perceive and wish to govern its use, particularly in educational contexts. Understanding student perspectives on GenAI policy can inform the development of more effective and ethically sound guidelines across various sectors. It highlights a participatory approach to policy development, which could enhance adoption and compliance.
Key insights
- Students engaged in a guided inquiry activity to co-design GenAI course policies.
- The process involved individual policy proposal development, followed by collaborative refinement incorporating diverse stakeholder perspectives.
- The study sought to identify practical factors prioritized by students in GenAI policies and their justifications.
- The research also aimed to understand how participants reflected on the policy design process itself.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28501
Related intelligence and resources
Previous
CultureConverse: A Multilingual Multi-turn Simulation Harness for Culturally Grounded Assistance in East and Southeast Asia
Next
The Effect of Emotional Context on Large Language Models' Endorsement of Premature Decisions: Comparing Emotional Vulnerability Across Six Commercial Models
Capturing emotional engagement in classrooms: a multimodal observational analysis across classroom contexts and its association with learning outcomes
Knowledge Resource
AIgnite: an educational toolkit for supporting primary students’ AI literacy cultivation
Knowledge Resource
Measuring cognitive presence in online discussions: automated detection and instructional insights from a MOOC context
Knowledge Resource
Data science for K-12: A design-based research study
Knowledge Resource
What AI competency do K-12 teachers need? Framework construction based on teachers' work scenarios and the development and validation of a scale
Knowledge Resource
Developing a school-based evaluation framework for education for sustainable development in primary school comprehensive practical activities: integrating CIPP, GreenComp, and action research
Knowledge Resource
Citation
Cite the original work (APA 7)
The original source is authoritative for this citation. Cite the source publication directly — this attribution is pending verification. Open the original source.
Verification
This is an authenticated AZIZ OS resource record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXE-2026-00005
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 31 August 2026
- Resource prepared by
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Resource status
- Research Summary / Knowledge Resource
- Underlying work
- A Guided Inquiry Approach to Students Co-Designing Generative AI Course Policies
- Original authors
- Attribution requires verification
- Original source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Provenance status
- Attribution requires verification
- Rights
- Underlying publication rights remain with the respective copyright holder(s). Refer to the original source for authoritative publication and licensing information.
This verification confirms the AZIZ OS resource record and its documented provenance. It does not establish authorship of the underlying external work.