Executive Guide
Mitigating AI Risks in Computing Education via LLM-Driven Lecture Video Curation
- Author
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Published
- August 18, 2026
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Publication type
- Executive Guide
- Availability
- Open access
Executive Summary
A research study evaluates the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) for curating specific segments from educational video recordings to address student inquiries in introductory programming. This method is designed to mitigate AI-related pedagogical risks, such as generative hallucinations and cognitive bypassing, by restricting the AI's role to identifying existing, validated content rather than generating new text. The study benchmarked three LLMs against human curation, assessing outputs for relevance, sufficiency, and redundancy.
A research study evaluates the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) for curating specific segments from educational video recordings to address student inquiries in introductory programming. This method is designed to mitigate AI-related pedagogical risks, such as generative hallucinations and cognitive bypassing, by restricting the AI's role to identifying existing, validated content rather than generating new text. The study benchmarked three LLMs against human curation, assessing outputs for relevance, sufficiency, and redundancy.
Why it matters
This development offers a potential strategy for integrating AI into educational or training contexts while managing inherent risks. By shifting AI's function from content generation to content curation from pre-validated sources, institutions can enhance learning support safely and efficiently. This could lead to improved educational outcomes and scalable training solutions without compromising accuracy or pedagogical integrity.
Key insights
- Large Language Models (LLMs) can be leveraged to retrieve targeted segments from pre-recorded educational videos in response to student questions.
- This approach aims to mitigate pedagogical risks associated with generative AI, including hallucinations and cognitive bypassing, by focusing on content curation.
- The methodology involves restricting AI to identifying educator-verified media rather than generating open-ended text responses.
- The study benchmarked two proprietary LLMs (Gemini 3.1 Pro, GPT 5.4 Pro) and one open-weight LLM (Qwen3.5 397B) against human-selected video segments.
- Evaluation criteria for LLM outputs included relevance, sufficiency, redundancy, and the presence of extraneous material.
Source
arXiv — Computers and Society — https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16131
Related publications
Previous
Psychological Determinants of Academic Integrity in the Use of Generative AI in Higher Education
Next
Characterizing Agentic Flooding of Government Services
Platform Adaptation Under Governance Interventions: Actor Best-Response Modeling and an External Public-Case Benchmark
Executive Guide
When Is an Agent Evaluation Over? Outcome Finality and Cross-Unit Separation
Executive Guide
Longitudinal and Graph-Augmented Prediction of Adolescent Substance Use Onset in the ABCD Study
Executive Guide
The ultimate carbon cost of a ChatGPT query
Executive Guide
Position: AI Governance Needs ISO-like Interoperability Protocols, Not Just Laws
Executive Guide
Persistent Spatio-Temporal Outage Hotspot Detection for Infrastructure Resilience Planning
Executive Guide
Download & citation
Cite this publication (APA 7)
Aziz Shuaib Ausi (2026). Mitigating AI Risks in Computing Education via LLM-Driven Lecture Video Curation. Executive Guide. Aziz Shuaib Ausi. https://www.azizshuaib.com/verify/ASA-EXG-2026-00392
Verification
This is an authenticated institutional record.
- Verification ID
- ASA-EXG-2026-00392
- Version
- v1.0 · r0
- Issued
- 8/18/2026
- Publisher
- Aziz Shuaib Ausi
- Licence
- All rights reserved. Reproduction requires written permission.