Intelligence

ai

Why we need an AI-resilient society

Source
arXiv — Computers and Society
Published
Last verified
18 Aug 2026
Confidence
High
Evidence
Original document retained
Reading time
1 min
Country
International
Relevant to
Technology & Data, Research & Evidence, Risk & Compliance

Executive summary

What happened, and why should leadership care?

The evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) through three distinct generations—from explicit logic to neural networks and now large language models (LLMs)—is profoundly transforming societal knowledge generation, decision-making, and governance. LLMs, in particular, introduce new systemic risks beyond those previously seen with deepfakes and synthetic media. This report characterizes AI's current state using a forensic-psychology profiling methodology, focusing on nine identified features, including hallucinations, bias, toxicity, and sycophancy, highlighting the urgent need for an AI-resilient society.

Why this matters

Why is this strategically important?

The rapid advancement of AI, particularly large language models, is fundamentally reshaping societal structures, including knowledge production and governance. Understanding and mitigating the new systemic risks associated with these technologies, such as bias and hallucinations, is crucial for maintaining stability and trust in information and decision-making processes.

Key insights

What should be noted from the evidence?

  • AI development has progressed through three generations: explicit logic programming, neural networks learning from data, and large language models using natural language as an interface.
  • These advancements extend beyond computer science, significantly impacting how societies create knowledge, make decisions, and self-govern.
  • While generative adversarial networks (GANs) introduced risks like deepfakes, large language models (LLMs) present a novel class of systemic risks.
  • A forensic-psychology profiling methodology has been applied to characterize AI, identifying nine documented features such as hallucinations, bias, toxicity, and sycophancy.
  • There is a recognized need to develop societal resilience against the challenges posed by evolving AI technologies.

Evidence and confidence

How far can this assessment be trusted?

High confidence. Named institution, original document retained and analysis corroborated.

Analysis is prepared editorially by Aziz Shuaib Ausi. The original publication remains the authoritative record, and executive judgement remains entirely human.

Source

Where does this originate?

Reported by arXiv — Computers and Society · International. This briefing summarises the publication for executive use; the document itself is not reproduced here.

Read the original publication