ai
The Use of Learning Management Systems for Self-paced Learning: The Case at a South African Public Access Centre
- Source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Published
- Last verified
- 14 Aug 2026
- Confidence
- Moderate
- Evidence
- Original document retained
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Country
- International
- Relevant to
- Research & Evidence, Technology & Data, People & Capability
Executive summary
What happened, and why should leadership care?
Research examining Learning Management System (LMS) adoption at a South African Public Access Centre (PAC) reveals that PACs are vital for digital inclusion and ICT skill development. While LMS platforms offer flexibility and support blended learning, their effectiveness is significantly hampered by persistent challenges including inadequate connectivity, outdated infrastructure, and ambiguities in course instructions. These operational and technical barriers impede the full realization of LMS benefits for self-paced learning.
Why this matters
Why is this strategically important?
This study highlights the critical role of public access points in digital literacy initiatives and the dual nature of technology adoption in such environments. Understanding these challenges and opportunities is vital for developing effective national strategies for digital inclusion and workforce upskilling in developing contexts, impacting long-term societal and economic development.
Key insights
What should be noted from the evidence?
- Public Access Centres (PACs) are crucial for advancing Information and Communication Technology (ICT) skills and fostering digital inclusion.
- Learning Management Systems (LMS) enable flexible access to educational resources and empower learners.
- Blended learning is identified as the preferred pedagogical approach within this context.
- LMS use enhances convenience for self-paced learning.
- Significant challenges to LMS effectiveness include poor internet connectivity, obsolete infrastructure, and unclear course instructions.
Evidence and confidence
How far can this assessment be trusted?
Moderate confidence. Provenance established; supporting evidence remains partial.
Analysis is prepared editorially by Aziz Shuaib Ausi. The original publication remains the authoritative record, and executive judgement remains entirely human.
Source
Where does this originate?
Reported by arXiv — Computers and Society · International. This briefing summarises the publication for executive use; the document itself is not reproduced here.
Read the original publication