ai
Technology, education and critical media literacy: potential, challenges, and opportunities
- Source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Published
- Last verified
- 12 Aug 2026
- Confidence
- Moderate
- Evidence
- Original document retained
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Country
- International
- Relevant to
- Research & Evidence, Technology & Data
- Topics
- airesearchtechnology
Executive summary
What happened, and why should leadership care?
A recent study investigates the impact of technology on media education, media literacy, and educommunication, with a focus on developing critical competencies and critical media literacy. The research, based on interviews with experts and a survey of university students, highlights how technological advancements contribute to challenges such as disinformation, fake news, incidental information exposure, and deepfakes, while also presenting educational opportunities.
Why this matters
Why is this strategically important?
The pervasive influence of technology on information consumption and the rise of complex challenges like deepfakes and disinformation necessitate a strategic re-evaluation of educational approaches. Cultivating critical media literacy is crucial for individuals to navigate increasingly complex information environments, impacting decision-making across all levels of society.
Key insights
What should be noted from the evidence?
- Technology significantly influences media education, media literacy, and educommunication.
- The study explores perceptions of these fields among both students and academic experts.
- A primary focus is on the development of critical competencies and critical media literacy.
- Technological advances are linked to challenges in information consumption, including disinformation, fake news, incidental exposure, and deepfakes.
- These challenges are concurrently viewed as opportunities within educational contexts.
Evidence and confidence
How far can this assessment be trusted?
Moderate confidence. Provenance established; supporting evidence remains partial.
Analysis is prepared editorially by Aziz Shuaib Ausi. The original publication remains the authoritative record, and executive judgement remains entirely human.
Source
Where does this originate?
Reported by arXiv — Computers and Society · International. This briefing summarises the publication for executive use; the document itself is not reproduced here.
Read the original publication