publisher
Student perceptions of flexible learning in Philippine higher education during COVID-19 and implications for crisis-responsive monitoring
- Source
- Frontiers in Education
- Published
- Last verified
- 13 Aug 2026
- Confidence
- High
- Evidence
- Original document retained
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Country
- International
- Relevant to
- Research & Evidence, Technology & Data, Executive Leadership, Risk & Compliance, Strategy & Planning
Executive summary
What happened, and why should leadership care?
A study in 'Frontiers in Education (International)' analyzed student perceptions of flexible learning systems (FLS) in Philippine higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research, involving 12,525 students, aimed to understand the structure of FLS and its variations across student demographics and technology usage. Key findings highlight the prevalence of FLS as a continuity strategy, and identify challenges related to internet connectivity and the characteristics of the student population utilizing these systems.
Why this matters
Why is this strategically important?
This study is strategically important as it provides insights into the operational challenges and technological dependencies of educational continuity strategies during crises. Understanding student experiences, particularly regarding connectivity and demographic factors, is crucial for developing resilient and equitable educational frameworks that can adapt to future disruptions.
Key insights
What should be noted from the evidence?
- Flexible Learning Systems (FLS) were central to higher education continuity in the Philippines during COVID-19.
- The study surveyed 12,525 students across Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao.
- A significant majority of respondents were female (67.5%).
- Many students utilized a learning management system during the pandemic (57.9%).
- A high proportion of students reported slow internet connectivity (57.8%), with only 11.8% having fast internet.
Evidence and confidence
How far can this assessment be trusted?
High confidence. Named institution, original document retained and analysis corroborated.
Analysis is prepared editorially by Aziz Shuaib Ausi. The original publication remains the authoritative record, and executive judgement remains entirely human.
Source
Where does this originate?
Reported by Frontiers in Education · International. This briefing summarises the publication for executive use; the document itself is not reproduced here.
Read the original publication