ai
Regulation, Power, and the Compliance 1 Paradox: A Longitudinal Study of Smart Homes
- Source
- arXiv — Computers and Society
- Published
- Last verified
- 18 Aug 2026
- Confidence
- Moderate
- Evidence
- Original document retained
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Country
- International
- Relevant to
- Policy & Regulation, Technology & Data, Research & Evidence, Risk & Compliance, Executive Leadership
Executive summary
What happened, and why should leadership care?
A longitudinal study, building on previous research, is being conducted on smart home technology adoption in Jordan. This research aims to understand the implications of smart homes for power dynamics, privacy, and inequality within domestic environments, specifically examining how cultural norms, regulatory frameworks, and daily technological practices influence these factors.
Why this matters
Why is this strategically important?
This research is strategically important as it sheds light on the socio-technical implications of smart home adoption, particularly regarding power, privacy, and inequality. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for developing effective regulatory frameworks and policies that address the challenges and opportunities presented by ubiquitous technology in domestic settings.
Key insights
What should be noted from the evidence?
- Smart home technologies are increasingly integrated into domestic environments.
- The implications of smart home technologies for power, privacy, and inequality are not yet fully understood, particularly in non-Western contexts.
- Cultural norms, regulatory frameworks, and everyday technological practices are key factors shaping domestic power dynamics in relation to smart homes.
- The study employs a two-phase grounded theory approach, including secondary analysis of existing interviews and new interviews conducted in 2025.
- Participants in the study include household members, domestic workers, policymakers, and civil society advocates.
Evidence and confidence
How far can this assessment be trusted?
Moderate confidence. Provenance established; supporting evidence remains partial.
Analysis is prepared editorially by Aziz Shuaib Ausi. The original publication remains the authoritative record, and executive judgement remains entirely human.
Source
Where does this originate?
Reported by arXiv — Computers and Society · International. This briefing summarises the publication for executive use; the document itself is not reproduced here.
Read the original publication