publisher
Principal job satisfaction across 27 education systems: trends and within-system associations with staffing shortages and workload, 2013–2024
- Source
- Frontiers in Education
- Published
- Last verified
- 27 Aug 2026
- Confidence
- High
- Evidence
- Original document retained
- Reading time
- 1 min
- Country
- International
- Relevant to
- Executive Leadership, People & Capability, Research & Evidence, Technology & Data
Executive summary
What happened, and why should leadership care?
An analysis of principal job satisfaction across 27 education systems from 2013 to 2024 reveals a modest decline by 2024, following a period of stability between 2013 and 2018. This study utilized harmonized principal records from the TALIS surveys, identifying job satisfaction as an indicator of occupational well-being and leadership sustainability. The research aimed to provide international evidence on temporal changes and organizational correlates, particularly in relation to staffing shortages and workload.
Why this matters
Why is this strategically important?
Declining principal job satisfaction is a critical indicator of potential systemic issues within leadership structures and workforce sustainability. This trend can impact the stability and effectiveness of educational leadership, potentially leading to increased turnover, reduced innovation, and broader challenges in operational management within educational institutions.
Key insights
What should be noted from the evidence?
- Principal job satisfaction remained largely stable between 2013 and 2018.
- A modest decrease in principal job satisfaction was observed by 2024.
- The study covered 27 education systems, utilizing data from TALIS 2013, 2018, and 2024 principal records (n = 16,257).
- The analysis aimed to understand temporal changes and organizational factors influencing principal job satisfaction.
- The results suggest a negative trend in principal job satisfaction over the last decade, particularly in the most recent period.
Evidence and confidence
How far can this assessment be trusted?
High confidence. Named institution, original document retained and analysis corroborated.
Analysis is prepared editorially by Aziz Shuaib Ausi. The original publication remains the authoritative record, and executive judgement remains entirely human.
Source
Where does this originate?
Reported by Frontiers in Education · International. This briefing summarises the publication for executive use; the document itself is not reproduced here.
Read the original publication