LLM-Generated or Human-Written? Comparing Review and Non-Review Papers on ArXiv

Recent research investigating content uploaded to arXiv's Computer Science domain indicates a significant increase in Large Language Model (LLM)-generated content across both review and non-review research papers. While LLM-generated content is more prevalent in review papers, the absolute number of non-review papers identified as LLM-generated is estimated to be six times higher.

The proliferation of LLM-generated content in academic and research outputs poses challenges to the integrity and credibility of scientific discourse and publication platforms. Understanding the distribution and scale of this phenomenon is critical for developing effective strategies to maintain research quality and trust.

ArXiv prohibited the upload of unpublished review papers in Computer Science, citing high prevalence of LLM-generated content, but without quantitative evidence.

Forward consideration, not a verified fact.