Intelligence

usa

How AI may change public policy, how we lead

Source
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Published
Last verified
10 Aug 2026
Confidence
Moderate
Evidence
Original document retained
Reading time
1 min
Country
USA
Relevant to
Executive Leadership, Policy & Regulation, Strategy & Planning, Technology & Data

Executive summary

What happened, and why should leadership care?

The Kennedy School has introduced a 10-year strategic plan that places significant emphasis on addressing the opportunities and risks associated with technology, specifically Artificial Intelligence. This initiative indicates an institutional recognition of the transformative impact of AI on public policy and leadership. The plan suggests a proactive approach to understanding and shaping the future role of technology in governance.

Why this matters

Why is this strategically important?

This development is strategically important because it signals a growing institutional focus on understanding and navigating the profound societal shifts driven by technological advancements, such as AI. It highlights the necessity for leaders and policymakers to grasp both the potential benefits and inherent risks of new technologies to ensure effective governance and policy formulation in an evolving global landscape.

Key insights

What should be noted from the evidence?

  • The Kennedy School has launched a 10-year strategic plan.
  • A primary focus of this plan is on the 'promise' and 'perils' of technology, particularly AI.
  • The plan aims to explore how AI may change public policy and leadership.

Evidence and confidence

How far can this assessment be trusted?

Moderate confidence. Provenance established; supporting evidence remains partial.

Analysis is prepared editorially by Aziz Shuaib Ausi. The original publication remains the authoritative record, and executive judgement remains entirely human.

Source

Where does this originate?

Reported by Harvard Graduate School of Education · USA. This briefing summarises the publication for executive use; the document itself is not reproduced here.

Read the original publication